走向认知科学的法学研究——从法学与科学的关系切入
发布时间:2018-01-15 16:24
本文关键词:走向认知科学的法学研究——从法学与科学的关系切入 出处:《法学家》2015年05期 论文类型:期刊论文
更多相关文章: 法律认知科学 法律社会科学 法学 科学 垂直整合
【摘要】:从知识史的角度看,法学与科学的交汇,呈现出法律社会科学与法律认知科学两波前后相继的浪潮。这一趋势促使法律学者重新反思法学与科学的关系。传统法学基于"意义无涉"与"价值无涉"两点理由,拒绝对法律问题的科学研究,但这种自我辩护忽视了法律实践的规约性特征和法律价值的科学基础。法律认知科学的温和科学主义研究方式,从新的角度解决法学的固有问题,有助于法律的工具价值与目的价值之实现。在垂直整合的框架中,认知科学、社会科学和传统法学各自占据不同的位置,以合理分工的方式推进法学学术的发展,追求人类知识大汇聚的智识理想。引言过去几百年间,科学确立了人类理智探索外在自然世界的最高典范。这种典范转换,超越单一学科的边界,推动着人类知识的变革。和其它人文与社会学科相比,古老的法学似乎有着更强的保守气质。~①法学,在其诞生之初就是职业性的知识体系,更多地包含着专家技艺与专门知识。作为职业性的实用知识,法学并非典型的人文学问,并不直接关切人的处境(human condition);而在另
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the history of knowledge, the intersection of law and science. There are two successive waves of law, social science and legal cognitive science. This trend urges legal scholars to rethink the relationship between law and science. Traditional jurisprudence is based on "no meaning" and "no value". Two reasons. But this self-defense neglects the statutory characteristics of legal practice and the scientific basis of legal value, as well as the moderate scientism research method of legal cognitive science. Solving the inherent problems of law from a new angle is helpful to the realization of the instrumental value and the objective value of law. In the framework of vertical integration, cognitive science, social science and traditional law occupy different positions. To promote the development of legal science in a rational division of labor and to pursue the intellectual ideal of the great convergence of human knowledge. Science has established the highest model for human reason to explore the external natural world. This paradigm transformation transcends the boundary of a single discipline and promotes the transformation of human knowledge. Compared with other humanities and social disciplines. The ancient jurisprudence seems to have a stronger conservative temperament. At the beginning of its birth, it is a professional knowledge system, which contains more professional skills and expertise, as a professional practical knowledge. Law is not a typical humanism, and it is not directly concerned about the human condition. And in the other place,
【作者单位】: 浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】:浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“认知心理学视野中的法律推理研究”(14NDJC116YB)的资助
【分类号】:D90
【正文快照】: 引言过去几百年间,科学确立了人类理智探索外在自然世界的最高典范。这种典范转换,超越单一学科的边界,推动着人类知识的变革。和其它人文与社会学科相比,古老的法学似乎有着更强的保守气质。#174;法学,在其诞生之初就是职业性的知识体系,更多地包含着专家技艺与专门知识。作
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 屈茂辉;匡凯;;传统法学的几何学范式论析[J];法学家;2014年03期
2 邓矜婷;;新法律现实主义的最新发展与启示[J];法学家;2014年04期
3 舒国滢;寻访法学的问题立场——兼谈“论题学法学”的思考方式[J];法学研究;2005年03期
4 王凌v,
本文编号:1429135
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/1429135.html