张某、杨某交通肇事暨附带民事案评析

发布时间：2018-01-18 13:32

本文关键词：张某、杨某交通肇事暨附带民事案评析　出处：《湖南大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：张某、杨某交通肇事暨附带民事案件中存在六大争议焦点，即张某、杨某能否共同承担交通事故的全部责任；张某、杨某是否构成交通肇事罪；是否属于共同犯罪；张某在做完笔录后一直在逃，是否构成交通肇事逃逸；杨某在逃，能否对张某、杨某提起附带民事诉讼；二审能否书面审理否定一审认定的汤某是实际车主、也是雇主的事实，直接改判汤某不需要承担连带责任。通过对本案评析后认为，张某、杨某应共同承担交通事故的全部责任，两人均构成了交通肇事罪，但不构成交通肇事罪的“共犯”，张某为逃避法律追究而逃跑在外的行为不构成交通肇事罪逃逸，但是存在“脱逃”行为，在刑民交叉案件中需要考虑先刑后民原则的例外情形，，二审没有调查和询问被害人及其诉讼代理人，没有查出另外的登记车主或实际车主，没有新的事实、证据或者理由，不应书面审理直接改判汤某不需要承担连带责任。
[Abstract]:Zhang, Yang traffic accident and incidental civil cases in the existence of six major dispute focus, that is, Zhang, Yang can jointly bear the full responsibility of traffic accidents; Zhang, whether Yang constitutes a traffic accident crime; Whether it is a joint crime; Zhang has been at large after the record, whether it constitutes a hit-and-run traffic escape; Yang is at large, can Zhang, Yang Mou incidental civil action; Whether the second trial can be written to deny the first instance that Tang is the actual owner, but also the facts of the employer, directly modified Tang does not need to bear joint and several liability. Through the assessment of the case, Zhang Mou. Yang should bear the full responsibility of the traffic accident, both constitute a traffic accident crime, but does not constitute a traffic accident crime "accomplice." Zhang's behavior of escaping from the outside in order to evade legal investigation does not constitute the escape of traffic accident crime, but there is a "escape" behavior, and the exception of the principle of first punishment and then the principle of people should be considered in the cross-criminal case. The second instance did not investigate and question the victims and their representatives ad litem, did not identify additional registered or actual owners, and did not have new facts, evidence or reasons. Should not be written trial directly modified Tang Mou does not need to assume joint and several liability.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D924.3;D920.5

【参考文献】