论ADR在美国环境行政纠纷解决领域的应用

发布时间：2018-02-09 10:36

本文关键词： 替代性纠纷解决方式 ADR 环境行政纠纷合意理念　出处：《中国政法大学》2009年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 替代性纠纷解决方式(Alternative Dispute Resolution,以下简称ADR)在行政法领域的应用是近年来美国行政法领域的重要变革,其间涉及到很多重要的行政法问题。但目前国内学者对这个问题的研究并不多。本文选择对这一重要过程中的一个侧面——环境行政纠纷解决领域ADR的应用进行论述,并不奢望能够窥一斑而知全豹,而是期望能够借此对一些相关的问题进行探讨,并为我国相关领域的立法和实践提供一些可供参考的资料。本文的结构如下: 引言部分主要介绍文章的选题并对主要参考资料进行综述。在这一部分,本文首先介绍了ADR在世界范围内的影响和德国学者对这一制度的探讨,从而引出我国大陆学者对这一问题的研究现状。之后,本文对美国的相关探讨进行了综述。第一章主要论述美国环境行政纠纷的传统解决方式及其弊端和环境ADR的兴起。在这一部分,本文首先对美国的环境行政体系进行了介绍,阐明了美国承担环境管制职能的行政机关及其具体权限;接下来本文介绍1986年以前美国环境行政纠纷传统解决方式的诸多弊端。最后,对ADR被引入环境行政纠纷解决领域的背景和过程作了一番梳理。第二章主要论述了美国联邦环保局在环境行政纠纷解决领域适用ADR的制度与实践。在这一部分,首先介绍了美国联邦环保局适用ADR的内部机构、范围和具体程序,接着又对美国联邦环保局适用ADR的五种具体技术:调解、仲裁、事实认定、小型审判及和解进行了较为全面的介绍。第三章对美国环境行政纠纷解决领域适用ADR的经验进行了总结并予以反思。在这一部分,本文首先探讨了最初作为民事纠纷解决方法的ADR适用于行政纠纷解决领域的妥当性,并探讨美国联邦环保局是通过何种手段保证ADR有效实施的。接下来本文对我国环境行政纠纷解决方式进行了反思。在余论中,本文对合意理念在我国行政法领域展开的背景及边界进行了初步的探讨。接下来的结论部分对全文的观点进行了总结。
[Abstract]:The application of alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in the field of administrative law is an important change in the field of American administrative law in recent years. There are a lot of important administrative law problems involved, but at present, there are not many researches on this issue by domestic scholars. This paper chooses to discuss the application of ADR in the field of environmental administrative dispute resolution, which is one of the important aspects of this important process. It is not extravagant to be able to peek at the whole leopard, but expect to discuss some related problems, and provide some reference materials for the legislation and practice of related fields in our country. The structure of this paper is as follows:. In this part, we first introduce the influence of ADR in the world and the discussion of this system by German scholars. The present situation of the research on this problem is brought forward. Then, the related research of the United States is summarized in this paper. The first chapter mainly discusses the traditional methods and disadvantages of environmental administrative disputes in the United States and the rise of environmental ADR. In this part, this paper first introduces the environmental administrative system of the United States. This paper expounds the administrative organs and their specific competence of environmental regulation in the United States. Then, this paper introduces the disadvantages of traditional solutions to environmental administrative disputes in the United States before 1986. Finally, The background and process of ADR being introduced into the field of environmental administrative dispute resolution are combed. The second chapter mainly discusses the system and practice of applying ADR in the field of environmental administrative dispute resolution. In this part, the author first introduces the internal organization, scope and specific procedure of ADR application by USEPA. Then it gives a comprehensive introduction to the five specific techniques that the Federal Environmental Protection Agency applies to ADR: mediation, arbitration, fact finding, small trial and settlement. The third chapter summarizes and reflects on the experience of applying ADR in the field of environmental administrative dispute resolution in the United States. In this part, this paper first discusses the appropriateness of ADR, which was originally used as a civil dispute resolution method, in the field of administrative dispute resolution. This paper also discusses the means by which the Federal Environmental Protection Agency ensures the effective implementation of ADR. Next, this paper reflects on the ways to resolve environmental administrative disputes in China. In the conclusion, this paper discusses the background and boundary of the idea of agreement in the field of administrative law in China. The following part of the conclusion of the full text of the point of view is summarized.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：DD915.4;D971.2

【参考文献】