三反、五反运动中的人民法庭刍析
发布时间:2018-02-16 01:12
本文关键词: “三反”运动 “五反”运动 人民法庭 出处:《西南政法大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:本文旨在通过建国初期“三反”运动和“五反”运动中人民法庭的状况进行分析,总结其宝贵的经验进而对新中国的审判司法制度作出反思。 引言部分阐述了相关学术研究的情况及本文研究的价值。客观系统地阐述了建国初期,人民法庭制度作为司法制度的重要组成部分,成为改革的重中之重。“三反”人民法庭和“五反”人民法庭,作为保障“三反”运动和“五反”运动顺利进行而产生的临时性司法机构,为中共共产党巩固人民政权,保障社会稳定,恢复发展国民经济起到保驾护航的作用。本文坚持历史唯物主义的基本原则并运用唯物辩证法。 第一部分,,分析了“三反”、“五反”人民法庭产生的环境背景。从历史缘起看,建国初期,为遏制“三害”、“五毒”现象,中共中央展开“三反”、“五反”运动,“三反”、“五反”人民法庭也应运而生。从法制环境看,相关法律法规极少,中共中央虽然彻底地废除了国民党统治时期所适用的《六法全书》,但是经政协会议和中央人民政府委员会制定或者批准的50件法律和法令中,有关“三反”、“五反”的仅有一件。 第二部分,阐述了建国初期“三反”、“五反”人民法庭制度的理论基础和法庭的性质,对法庭工作、机构设置、特别是对法庭之间的关系及其与各组织的关系进行了较为细致的说明。 第三部分,从立法思想渊源、立法内容、立法特点三个方面对创设“三反”、“五反”人民法庭的法律文件进行了比较全面的梳理。 第四部分,是本文的重中之重,作者认为任何学术研究的最终目的是为了能够更明确以至更顺利地解决今天该项领域中仍旧存在的问题,未雨绸缪,防微杜渐。对“三反”、“五反”人民法庭的历史意义和现实意义要进行全面、深刻地认识。在坚持唯物辩证法的前提下,对“三反”、“五反”人民法庭进行反思,继续完善社会主义司法制度,深入司法体制改革,特别是繁荣司法文化。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to analyze the situation of the people's courts in the movement of "three evils" and the "five evils" in the early days of the people's Republic of China, sum up their valuable experience and then reflect on the judicial system of the people's Republic of China. In the foreword part, the author expounds the relevant academic research and the value of this research. It objectively and systematically expounds the people's court system as an important part of the judicial system in the early days of the founding of the people's Republic of China. The people's Court of the "three evils" and the people's Court of the "five evils", as a temporary judicial organ that guaranteed the smooth progress of the "three evils" and the "five evils" movements, consolidated the people's power for the Communist Party of China. This paper adheres to the basic principles of historical materialism and applies materialist dialectics. The first part analyzes the environmental background of the "three evils", the "five evils" and the "five evils" in order to contain the phenomenon of "three evils" and "five poisons" in the early years of the founding of the people's Republic of China. The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China launched the "three evils", the "five evils", the "three evils", the "five evils" and the people's courts came into being. From the point of view of the legal environment, there are very few relevant laws and regulations. Although the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China has completely abolished the "book of the six laws" applicable during the period of Kuomintang rule, only one of the 50 laws and decrees formulated or approved by the CPPCC session and the Central people's Government Committee concerned the "three evils" and the "five evils". The second part expounds the theoretical basis and nature of the "three evils" and "five evils" people's court system in the early years of the founding of the people's Republic of China, as well as the establishment of institutions for the work of the court. In particular, the relationship between the court and its relationship with the various organizations are described in detail. The third part, from the legislative thought origin, the legislation content, the legislation characteristic three aspects to create "the three evils", "the five anti" people's court legal document has carried on the comparatively comprehensive comb. Part 4th is the most important part of this paper. The author thinks that the ultimate purpose of any academic research is to solve the problems that still exist in this field more clearly and smoothly, and to plan ahead. The historical and practical significance of the people's courts against the "three evils" and the "five evils" should be comprehensively and profoundly understood. On the premise of adhering to materialist dialectics, the people's courts against the "three evils" and the "five evils" should reflect on the people's courts of the "three evils" and the "five evils". We will continue to improve the socialist judicial system and deepen the reform of the judicial system, especially the prosperity of the judicial culture.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D929;D651.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 胡夏冰;陈春梅;;我国人民法庭制度的发展历程[J];法学杂志;2011年02期
2 公丕祥;;董必武与建国之初司法改革运动[J];江苏社会科学;2011年04期
本文编号:1514316
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/1514316.html