美国“337条款”及我国应对政策的研究

发布时间：2018-02-28 16:40

本文关键词： 337条款知识产权侵权贸易保护主义　出处：《华东政法大学》2009年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 337条款原指美国《1930年关税法》的第337条,其立法目的是管制外国厂商对美国倾销产品以及商业垄断等不公平的贸易行为,几经修改和完善,演化成以知识产权侵权为理由来规范外国厂商商业行为的法律规范。2008年对于全球经济无疑是灾难性的一年。美国次贷危机的扩大,以及对金融衍生工具的管理不善,导致全球经济都陷入萎靡。美国作为世界经济强国,此次金融危机的发源地,经济上也遭受了巨大的损失。可预见的是,为了振兴国内行业,美国在国际贸易中对其国内产业的保护将会愈演愈烈,而337条款在近年来一直充当着美国对外国企业进行排挤的利器。随着我国对美贸易顺差的不断扩大,我国企业屡次遭到美国以337条款为由进行的调查,我们完全有必要对美国337条款进行分析,以期得出有益于我国出口型企业正常发展的合理建议。本文共分三部分。第一个部分是基本介绍,对337条款作了简要的介绍和分析,阐述了337条款的由来及历史沿革。第二部分介绍了337条款与WTO规则等条例的比较。虽然从表面上看,337条款提供了行政程序法所设定的相应程序保护条例,似乎不构成不公平待遇,但是通过和其他条例内容的细致比较,可以看出美国对进口产品和国内产品有着完全不同的待遇。第三部分阐述了政府、行业协会、企业在应对“337调查”时应扮演的角色和应采取的对策。
[Abstract]:Section 337 refers to Article 337 of the United States Customs tax Act of 1930, the legislative purpose of which is to regulate unfair trade practices of foreign manufacturers against dumping products and commercial monopolies in the United States, which have been revised and perfected several times. The 2008 is undoubtedly a disastrous year for the global economy. The expansion of the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States and the mismanagement of financial derivatives. The United States, as the world's economic powerhouse, has suffered enormous economic losses from the birthplace of the financial crisis. Predictably, in order to revitalize the domestic industry, The protection of domestic industries by the United States in international trade will be intensified, and Section 337 has been used as a sharp weapon for the United States to crowd out foreign enterprises in recent years. With the expansion of China's trade surplus with the United States, Chinese enterprises have been repeatedly investigated by the United States on the basis of Section 337. It is absolutely necessary for us to analyze Section 337 of the United States in order to draw reasonable suggestions that are beneficial to the normal development of export-oriented enterprises in China. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is a basic introduction, a brief introduction and analysis of Section 337, the origin and historical evolution of Section 337. The second part introduces the comparison between Section 337 and regulations such as WTO rules. Although on the surface, Section 337 provides the corresponding procedural protection regulations established by the Administrative procedure Law, it does not seem to constitute unfair treatment. But through careful comparison with other regulations, we can see that the United States has a completely different treatment for imports and domestic products. The third part elaborates the government, the trade association, the enterprise should play the role and the countermeasure in the response "337 investigation".
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D971.2

【参考文献】