财产征收立法比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-09 04:27

本文选题：财产征收　切入点：公共利益　出处：《兰州大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 我国是一个现代化的后发国家,对于统一的财产征收、行政补偿制度还未建立。法律制度的不健全,使得在进行财产征收时出现许多问题和矛盾,如因为没有法律全面规制,使得地方政府偷钻法律空子,违法行使征收权,严重危害财产被征收人的合法权益。它山之石可以攻玉,我们应该对其他国家完善的财产征收制度进行系统的研究和学习,结合具体国情,为我国完善财产征收制度提供有益的借鉴与启示。本文着重系统地比较中外国家及其他地区的财产征收制度,试图从中找出一些对我国有借鉴性的可行性制度,从而完善我国的财产征收制度。本文共分为四个部分,第一部分阐释财产征收的基础理论。第二部分为财产征收的正当性前提—公共利益。第三部分为文章的重点,该部分为财产征收立法比较研究；分为四节,首先是对财产征收程序的比较,其次是财产征收补偿模式的比较,再次是财产征收救济方式比较,最后对前三节进行系统比较后得出研究结论,即我国在财产征收程序、补偿、救济方面存在的缺陷。第四部分主要是对完善我国财产征收法律制度提出一些建议,本部分主要从完善公共利益的实体界定及程序设计的建议；对规范及健全我国财产征收程序的建议；以及建议我国在财产征收补偿中推行市场介入机制,实行公正补偿;着重要贯彻落实补偿的可持续安置及社会保障；建议规范行政救济,引入诉讼机制；最后提出制定统一的《财产征收法》的设想。
[Abstract]:Our country is a modern developing country, for the unified property expropriation, the administrative compensation system has not been established. The legal system is not perfect, so there are many problems and contradictions in the process of property expropriation, such as because there is no comprehensive regulation of the law. It makes local governments steal holes in the law, illegally exercise the right to levy, and seriously endanger the legitimate rights and interests of the property expropriated. It is a stone that can attack the jade. We should systematically study and study the property expropriation system perfect in other countries. Combined with the specific national conditions, for our country to improve the property expropriation system to provide useful reference and inspiration. This paper focuses on the systematic comparison of property expropriation systems between China and foreign countries and other regions, and tries to find out some feasible systems that can be used for reference in order to perfect the property expropriation system in China. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part explains the basic theory of property expropriation. The second part is the legitimate premise of property expropriation-public interest. The third part is the focus of the article, this part is the comparative study of property expropriation legislation; it is divided into four sections. The first is the comparison of the property expropriation procedure, the second is the comparison of the compensation mode of the property expropriation, and the second is the comparison of the relief mode of the property expropriation. Finally, the conclusion is drawn after the systematic comparison of the first three sections, that is, the property expropriation procedure, the compensation in our country. Part 4th mainly puts forward some suggestions to perfect the legal system of property expropriation in our country, this part mainly from perfecting the entity definition of public interest and the suggestion of procedure design; Suggestions on standardizing and perfecting the procedure of property expropriation in our country, as well as the suggestion that our country should carry out market intervention mechanism in property expropriation compensation, implement fair compensation, carry out the sustainable resettlement and social security of compensation. This paper proposes to standardize administrative relief and introduce litigation mechanism, and finally puts forward the idea of making a unified property expropriation law.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D920.4

【引证文献】