宠物诊疗纠纷的定性与法律适用

发布时间：2018-03-13 09:58

  本文选题：宠物　切入点：诊疗　出处：《法律适用》2013年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正【案情】原告(上诉人):张玉琴。被告(被上诉人):上海交农动物医疗有限公司。2011年6月23日18时30分左右,原告携小型宠物犬至被告处求诊,主诉小狗呕吐、腹泄已3天,要求用药。18时41分开始,被告兽医对小狗进行听诊、量体温,并向原告询问情况。当兽医提出小狗呼吸困难并伴有便血,需要进行验血等全面检查时,原告在了解了所需费用后,提出要求注射一剂止吐针剂。兽医告知在未确诊
[Abstract]:The plaintiff (appellant: Zhang Yuqin). The defendant (appellee: Shanghai Agricultural Animal Medical Co., Ltd.). About 18:30 on June 23rd 2011, the plaintiff came to the defendant with a small pet dog for medical treatment. The plaintiff complained of puppies vomiting and diarrhea for 3 days. Ask for medication. Starting at 18:41, the defendant's veterinarian gives the dog a auscultation, takes body temperature, and asks the plaintiff about the situation. When the vet proposes that the dog has difficulty breathing and is accompanied by bloody stool, he needs to undergo a blood test and other comprehensive examinations. After knowing the cost, the plaintiff asked for an injection of an antiemetic. The veterinarian informed him that the diagnosis had not been made
【作者单位】： 上海市静安区人民法院;
【分类号】：D920.5
，

本文编号：1605884