美国电子证据开示变革及对我国的启示

发布时间：2018-03-18 06:36

本文选题：电子存储信息　切入点：证据开示　出处：《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：新的美国《联邦民事诉讼程序规则》要求当事人尽早处理电子证据开示问题,对因疏忽而出示特权保护的文件规定了"收回"条款,规定了因正常操作而导致电子存储信息的灭失的"安全港"条款。然而,美国电子证据开示制度与欧盟隐私保护法及其他国家的障碍立法等存在明显冲突。为解决冲突,最有效的方式是修订《海牙取证公约》,对域外电子证据开示的问题予以规定。研究美国的电子证据开示制度也可以得出一些对我国有益的启示,主要包括:完善电子证据开示的相关立法;制定个人数据保护的法律;借助公约或双边条约减少与美国电子证据开示的冲突;提高对美国电子证据开示制度的认识等。
[Abstract]:The new Federal rules of Civil procedure in the United States require the parties to deal with the issue of electronic evidence disclosure as soon as possible, and provide a "recovery" clause for documents that are inadvertently presented with privileged protection. The "safe harbour" clause, which provides for the loss of electronic stored information due to normal operation. However, there is a clear conflict between the United States electronic evidence discovery system and the EU privacy protection law and other barrier legislation of other countries. In order to resolve the conflict, The most effective way is to amend the Hague Convention on Forensics to regulate the issue of the disclosure of electronic evidence abroad. The study of the electronic evidence discovery system in the United States can also lead to some useful revelations for our country. It mainly includes: perfecting the relevant legislation of electronic evidence discovery; making laws of personal data protection; reducing the conflict with American electronic evidence discovery by means of conventions or bilateral treaties; and improving the understanding of American electronic evidence discovery system and so on.
【作者单位】：武汉大学国际法研究所;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目“国际民商事司法协助条约在我国实施实证研究”(10YJC820087)
【分类号】：D971.2;D925.1

【参考文献】