名实之辩与韩非法治思想

发布时间：2018-03-20 12:41

本文选题：韩非　切入点：名实之辩　出处：《学术交流》2013年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："名实观"是诸子百家建构其政治主张的不容回避的理论前提,春秋战国时期盛行的"名实之辩"为韩非名实观的形成提供了浓厚的土壤。在"何以为名"方面,韩非既吸收了儒家的正名论,主张以名为首,通过以法正名来批判儒家的以礼正名,强调尚法而不尚贤。在"何为名本"方面,韩非吸收了道家的"以道为本"观,发展成为"以法为本",实现了"法立而不用,刑没而不行"的新"无为"论。在"何以为实"方面,韩非借鉴了墨家的经验主义作法,将"取实予名"发展成为"循名责实"的参验论,采用了墨家的尚同思想,主张"上法而不上贤"。对韩非名实观比较研究,进一步揭示出韩非法治思想形成的独特逻辑与时代特点。我们既要看到他们彼此之间的聚讼纷争,同时也要关注他们之间的内在逻辑关联。
[Abstract]:"the concept of name and reality" is an unavoidable theoretical premise for the various schools of thought to construct their political opinions. The "argument of name and reality" prevailing in the Spring and Autumn and warring States period provides a strong soil for the formation of Han Fei's concept of name and fact. Han Fei has absorbed the Confucian nominalism, advocated taking the name as the first, criticized the Confucian rite in the name of the law, and emphasized that the law is not virtuous. In the aspect of "what is the name of the name," Han Fei has absorbed the Taoist view of "taking the Tao as the foundation". It has developed into a new "inaction" theory of "taking the law as the basis" and realizing "not using the law but not the law". In the aspect of "why is it realistic", Han Fei drew lessons from the empiricism of the Mohist school. The theory of "taking facts and giving names" has been developed into a theory of "according to names and responsibilities and facts", which adopts Mohism's thought of still being the same, and advocates "the law of the law but not the sages". A comparative study of Han Fei's concept of name and reality is made. This paper further reveals the unique logic and characteristics of the formation of Han Fei's thought of rule of law. We should not only see the disputes between them, but also pay attention to the internal logical connection between them.
【作者单位】：黑龙江大学哲学学院;哈尔滨师范大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：B222;D909.2

【相似文献】