中美量刑规范比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-26 22:00

本文选题：量刑公正　切入点：量刑指导　出处：《政治与法律》2013年09期

【摘要】：量刑是最终确定犯罪人刑事责任的必经阶段,追求量刑公正需要实体法和程序法的双重保障。中国和美国在量刑规范问题上虽然经历不同,但都形成了具有代表性的文本。对刑罚的量化是评估刑事责任的外在表现形式。量刑发展是一个不断专业化的过程,通过不同的技术设计可能实现既减小刑罚差异又实现个案公正的目标。美国的量刑改革历时弥久,与政策和司法实践互动颇多,积累了许多经验,其代表规范集中体现了改革的取向和成果。中国的量刑规范化改革虽处于发展的初期,也形成了规范文本,在融合理论和实践、平衡精致和可行等方面,可有比较地借鉴美国的经验。
[Abstract]:Sentencing is the necessary stage to determine the criminal responsibility of the offender. The pursuit of sentencing justice requires the dual protection of substantive law and procedural law. Although China and the United States have different experiences on sentencing norms, However, both of them have formed representative texts. The quantification of punishment is the external manifestation of evaluating criminal responsibility. The development of sentencing is a process of continuous specialization. It is possible to achieve the goal of reducing penalty differences and achieving case justice through different technical designs. The sentencing reform in the United States has lasted a long time, interacted with policy and judicial practice, and accumulated a lot of experience. Although the reform of sentencing standardization in China is in the early stages of development, it has also formed a normative text, which integrates theory and practice, balances delicacy and feasibility, and so on. The experience of the United States can be used for comparison.
【作者单位】：中山大学法学院;
【基金】：2009年度教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(项目编号:09YJC820124) 广东省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划2009年度规划项目(项目编号:09G-01)的资助 “中山大学哲学社会科学创新研究群体培育项目”(项目编号:12000-3281901) 2011年度高校基本科研业务费中山大学文科青年教师培育项目(项目编号:1137109)的资助
【分类号】：D971.2;D925.2

【参考文献】