论“好意同乘”交通事故的侵权责任

发布时间：2018-03-30 08:01

本文选题：好意同乘　切入点：交通事故　出处：《北京交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年02期

【摘要】："好意同乘"乃情谊行为之一种,"好意同乘"交通事故则属于侵权行为。"好意同乘"交通事故致搭乘者损害,供乘者应承担过错责任,就其一般过失对搭乘者承担责任。"好意同乘"可减轻供乘者的赔偿责任,减责之依据在于公序良俗原则。搭乘者对损害的发生构成与有过失时,亦可减轻供乘者之赔偿责任。"好意同乘"交通事故涉及第三人时,供乘者与第三人构成共同侵权,搭乘者与有过失的减责效果不仅及于供乘者,也及于第三人。"好意同乘"不能成为决定搭乘者是否享有精神损害赔偿请求权的因素。据此,既可弥补我国现行法律规范之漏洞,又可统一法院审判实践,妥适解决好意同乘纠纷。
[Abstract]:"sharing with good will" is one of the acts of friendship, and the traffic accident of "sharing with good intentions" is an act of tort. The "well-intentioned and shared ride" traffic accident causes damage to the passenger, and the passenger shall bear the responsibility for the fault. For its general fault, the passenger is liable. "good faith and sharing" can reduce the liability of the passenger, the basis of which lies in the principle of public order and good custom. When the passenger is guilty of the damage, The liability of the passenger may also be alleviated. When a "good ride" traffic accident involves a third person, the passenger and the third party constitute joint infringement, and the liability reduction effect of the passenger and the fault is not only as good as the passenger, but also in the case of the third party. Also to the third person. "good will and sharing" cannot be a factor that determines whether the passenger enjoys the right to claim compensation for moral damage. Based on this, it can not only make up for the loopholes in the current legal norms of our country, but also unify the court's trial practice. The dispute should be settled in good faith.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学国际学院;中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：北京市哲学社会科学“十二五”规划项目青年项目“侵权责任法的一般条款构成要件该当性重构”(12FXC035)
【分类号】：D920.5;D922.14;D923

【参考文献】