论司法解释权

发布时间：2018-04-04 01:20

本文选题：司法解释权　切入点：司法权　出处：《湖南师范大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 司法解释权是司法权的重要组成部分,它的配置合理与否,直接关系到司法功能的实现及效果。目前,英美法系与大陆法系国家均将司法权赋予法院行使,司法解释权作为司法权的当然之意,自然交由法院或法官,由法官在面对个案时行使。我国的司法体制和司法解释权的配置的则独具特色,人民法院和人民检察院都视为司法机关,司法解释权同时配置给最高人民法院和最高人民检察院共同行使。运行实践表明,我国的这种配置,造成司法解释权行使过程中往往产生了较多的问题,有的涉嫌侵害立法权、立法解释权,有的甚至涉嫌违宪。本人抱着解决问题的态度,对有关司法解释权的问题进行了论述,希冀在我国的宪政建设进程中,对于司法解释权的配置改革提供一种参考。论文共分五个部分:第一部分主要是解决司法解释权的基本理论问题。具体内容是:司法解释权的基本概念、司法解释权产生的现实动因、司法解释权与立法解释权、行政解释权的区别。第二部分论述了宪法视野下的司法解释权。具体内容是:宪法上的司法权之含义、司法解释权的宪法基础与宪法依据。第三部分论述了司法解释权的配置及正当性分析。具体内容为:我国司法解释权的体制及正当性分析、外国司法解释权配置及正当性分析、我国司法解释权配置之反思。第四部分对我国当前司法解释权运行不规范之状况进行了检讨。具体内容是:解释主体方面的问题、解释方式方面的问题和解释范围方面的问题。第五部分提出了解决问题的方案。具体内容是:完善我国司法解释权行使状况不规范应坚持的原则、完善我国司法解释权不规范行使的制度构想。
[Abstract]:The power of judicial interpretation is an important part of judicial power. Whether its disposition is reasonable or not is directly related to the realization and effect of judicial function.At present, the judicial power is given to the court in the common law system and the civil law system, and the power of judicial interpretation, as the natural meaning of the judicial power, is naturally handed over to the court or the judge, and exercised by the judge in the face of the case.The disposition of judicial system and judicial interpretation power in our country has its own characteristics. The people's court and the people's procuratorate are regarded as judicial organs, and the judicial interpretation power is allocated to the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate to exercise jointly.The operation practice shows that this kind of disposition of our country often causes many problems in the process of exercising the power of judicial interpretation, some of them are suspected of infringing on the legislative power, the power of legislative interpretation, and some of them are even suspected of violating the constitution.With the attitude of solving the problem, I discuss the problem of judicial interpretation power, and hope to provide a reference for the configuration reform of judicial interpretation power in the process of constitutionalism construction in our country.The thesis is divided into five parts: the first part is to solve the basic theoretical problems of judicial interpretation.The concrete content is: the basic concept of the power of judicial interpretation, the realistic cause of the power of judicial interpretation, the difference between the power of judicial interpretation and the power of legislative interpretation, the power of administrative interpretation.The second part discusses the power of judicial interpretation from the perspective of the Constitution.The specific contents are: the meaning of the judicial power in the constitution, the constitutional basis and the constitutional basis of the power of judicial interpretation.The third part discusses the allocation and legitimacy of judicial interpretation power.The concrete contents are: the system and legitimacy analysis of judicial interpretation power in our country, the disposition and legitimacy analysis of foreign judicial interpretation power, and the reflection on the disposition of judicial interpretation power in our country.The fourth part reviews the non-standard operation of the power of judicial interpretation.The concrete content is: the explanation subject aspect question, the explanation way aspect question and the explanation scope aspect question.The fifth part puts forward the solution to the problem.The concrete contents are as follows: perfecting the principles that should be adhered to in the exercise of the judicial interpretation power in our country, and perfecting the system conception of the non-standard exercise of the judicial interpretation power in our country.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D920.4

【引证文献】