英国行政裁判所制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-21 08:14

本文选题：行政裁判所 + 行政纠纷　；参考：《西南政法大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 行政裁判所制度作为英国行政法中所特有的制度,在其行政法制进程中起到了独特的作用。其每年裁判的行政案件数量也自建立之时起逐年递增,大大缓解了普通法院裁判的压力,同时也促进了行政纠纷的及时解决。正因为此,英国行政裁判所制度为世界其他国家所借鉴和采纳,作为一项独具特色的制度,受到了包括加拿大、澳大利亚、美国、新西兰等国家的重视和借鉴,并根据其各自的本国行政司法体系之特点作出了相应的变革,建立了各自的行政裁判所制度,并产生了很好的效果。正是在这样的大背景之下,本文通过对大量英国行政法学者研究行政裁判所制度专著和论文的翻译和整合分析的基础上来展开文章的论述,力求使得我国行政法制建设也能够吸取到英国行政裁判所制度中的精华。在具体结构上,本文分为五个部分来展开论述,第一部分从鉴别和认定英国行政裁判所的性质和地位入手,针对英国国内也长期存在的将行政裁判所的性质到底定论为行政性质还是司法性质,以及行政裁判所到底是属于行政机关还是属于法院的争论,论文从原因到现实结论都给予了阐述；第二部分对体系庞杂的英国裁判所体系进行了分类和具体介绍,列举了每一类型裁判所中的典型例子,并从组成人员、裁判程序、代理问题等各个方面对典型裁判所进行了有详有略的介绍,以期望能更加直观生动的展示英国行政裁判所体系的原貌；第三部分主要对行政裁判所的运行程序进行了详尽的论述,正是因为英国行政裁判所长期存在着体系庞杂,秩序混乱的局面,所以其不统一、不规范的裁判程序长期以来都是英国国内审查裁判所制度时十分重视的问题,本部分从代理形式、告知上诉权、说明裁决理由等方面对裁判所裁决程序的要求进行了较为全面的论述；第四部分作为对前面所述的各方面问题的一个总结与分析,通过对英国历史上两次对裁判所制度的重大审查(弗兰克斯委员会审查和里盖特委员会审查)的内容进行了具体论述,对两次审查报告进行了分析,并对英国行政裁判所制度的完善给出了具体建议,在此部分的最后也根据这些建议指出了英国行政裁判所最近几年的最新发展动向；第五部分联系中国行政法制的实际情况,针对论文前面几部分所提出的重要问题,有针对性的借鉴英国行政裁判所制度,对完善我国行政法制尤其是我国行政法律制度中与裁判所在职能上相类似的制度的建设给出了指导性的建议。
[Abstract]:As a special system in British administrative law, the system of administrative adjudication has played a unique role in the process of administrative legal system. The number of administrative cases adjudicated every year has been increasing year by year since its establishment, which greatly alleviates the pressure on the ordinary courts to adjudicate, and also promotes the timely resolution of administrative disputes. Because of this, the British administrative adjudication system has been used for reference and adopted by other countries in the world. As a unique system, it has received the attention and reference of Canada, Australia, the United States, New Zealand and other countries. According to the characteristics of their respective administrative judicial system, the corresponding changes have been made, and their administrative adjudicatory system has been established, and has produced very good results. It is against this background that this paper discusses the translation and integration of a large number of British administrative law scholars on the basis of the translation and integration of the monographs and papers of the administrative adjudication institution. Make every effort to make our country administrative legal system construction also can absorb the essence of the British administrative adjudication system. In the specific structure, this paper is divided into five parts to discuss, the first part from the identification and determination of the nature and status of the British administrative adjudication, In view of the long-standing dispute in the United Kingdom that the nature of the administrative tribunal is administrative or judicial, and whether the administrative tribunal belongs to the administrative organ or the court, In the second part, the author classifies and introduces the complicated system of the English referees, enumerates the typical examples of each type of referees, and analyzes the composition of the judges and the procedure of the judges. The agency issues and other aspects of the typical referees were introduced in detail in order to hope to more intuitive and vivid display of the original appearance of the British administrative referee system; The third part mainly discusses the operation procedure of the administrative adjudicators in detail. It is precisely because the British administrative adjudicators have long had a complicated and chaotic system, so they are not unified. Non-standard adjudication procedure has long been a very important issue in the review of the adjudicatory system in the United Kingdom. In this part, the right of appeal is informed from the form of agency. The requirements of the adjudication procedure are discussed comprehensively in the aspects of explaining the reasons for the adjudication. The fourth part is a summary and analysis of the problems mentioned above. The contents of the two major reviews of the judicial system in British history (the Franks Commission Review and the Rigate Committee Review) are discussed in detail, and the two reviews are analyzed. At the end of this part, the author points out the latest development trend of the British Administrative Court in recent years. The fifth part relates to the actual situation of China's administrative legal system. In view of the important questions raised in the first few parts of the thesis, the author draws lessons from the British administrative adjudication system. The paper gives some instructive suggestions on how to perfect our country's administrative legal system, especially the construction of the system which is similar to the administrative law system in our country.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D956.1

【相似文献】