保辜制度特性分析及现代影响

发布时间：2018-04-24 13:01

本文选题：保辜制度 + 唐代　；参考：《烟台大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 保辜制度是中国古代刑事法律规范中一项旨在保护人身伤害案件中的受害人、追究加害人的法律责任,进而整合社会关系的制度。具体来说,当人身伤害案件发生后,受害人伤情未定,如果受害人在法定的期限(即保辜期限,简称辜限)内因该伤害死亡,对加害人以杀人罪论;如果受害人在法定的期限内没有死亡或因其他原因死亡,及在法定的期限之外死亡,则对加害人以伤害罪论处。此制度在中国古代社会存在发展了两千余年。唐代是保辜制度的发展成熟时期,保辜制度得以定型化、系统化。保辜制度在宋、元、明、清继续发展,并在立法及司法领域产生了一系列重要变化。保辜制度有其深刻的思想源渊,存在自身的规律性。本篇论文共分为四章来全面系统的介绍保辜制度。第一章,为了使读者对保辜制度有一个初步了解,首先叙明保辜制度的基本原理。继而主要依从保辜制度的历史发展脉络依次介绍唐代以前的保辜制度、唐代以后的保辜制度。第二章,从法律的实体规定和具体的操作程序两个方面介绍唐代的保辜制度。由于保辜制度在唐代发展最为完备,所以这部分的内容以唐代为例详细介绍保辜制度的具体内容和操作程序。第三章,从保辜制度的合理之处与欠缺之处两方面入手,对存在于中国历史达几千年之久的保辜制度作一全面的理性分析。其合理性主要表现在反它映了中国儒家的“无讼”思想;反映了古代社会统治阶级的“慎刑”统治理念;体现了古代刑法对刑事因果关系理论认识水平的不断提高。其欠缺之处主要表现在它只注重行为结果而忽视行为人的主观态度;包含了太多偶然因素;缺乏相关配套制度。第四章,着眼于古代保辜制度与现代社会的结合。主要从古代保辜制度的谦抑价值、人道价值、权利补救价值等方面展开。保辜制度从创设起一直在中国历朝历代得到沿用和完善,不难看出,这项制度有着顽强的生命力,对于稳定社会秩序起到了极大的积极作用。我国古代保辜制度虽与近、现代刑法学中的诸多理论存在着较大的冲突,导致了近、现代刑法对其进行了彻底的否弃,但保辜制度作为我国刑法史上一项重要的制度,其曾起的重要作用及所具有的沿革意义是不容忽视的。从总体上讲,保辜制度是我国古代刑法中有积极意义的法律制度,作为一种优秀文化遗产,我们应将其合理成分发扬光大。
[Abstract]:The system of protection against Koo is a system in ancient Chinese criminal law that aims to protect the victims of personal injury cases, investigate the legal responsibility of the perpetrators, and then integrate social relations. Specifically, when the personal injury case occurred, the victim injury situation is not determined, if the victim died as a result of the injury within the legal time limit (that is, the time limit for the protection of the victim, referred to as the Koo limit), the perpetrator will be subject to the crime of homicide; If the victim does not die within the statutory period or for any other cause, or dies outside the statutory period, the offender shall be punished as injurious. This system existed in ancient Chinese society for more than two thousand years. The Tang Dynasty was the mature period of the system, and the system was formalized and systematized. Baogu system continued to develop in Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, and produced a series of important changes in the legislative and judicial fields. The system of protecting Koo has its profound ideological source and its own regularity. This paper is divided into four chapters to comprehensively and systematically introduce the system. In the first chapter, in order to give readers a preliminary understanding of the system, the basic principles of the system are described. Following the historical development of the system, the author introduces the system before the Tang Dynasty and the system after the Tang Dynasty. The second chapter introduces the system of protection and Koo-protection in Tang Dynasty from two aspects: the substantive provisions of law and the specific operation procedure. Since the system of protection of Koo was the most complete in the Tang Dynasty, this part of the content of the Tang Dynasty as an example to introduce the specific content of the system and the operation procedures. In the third chapter, the author makes a comprehensive and rational analysis of the system of protecting Koo, which existed for thousands of years in China, from the two aspects of the rationality and deficiency of the system. Its rationality is mainly reflected in the reflection of the "no lawsuit" thought of the Chinese Confucianists, the "careful punishment" ruling concept of the ruling class in ancient society, and the continuous improvement of the understanding level of the criminal causality theory in the ancient criminal law. The main deficiency is that it only pays attention to the result of behavior and neglects the subjective attitude of the actor; it contains too many accidental factors; and it lacks the relevant supporting system. Chapter four focuses on the combination of ancient protection and modern society. It mainly starts from the modest value, humanity value and right remedy value of the ancient system of protection and Koo. Since the establishment of the system, the system has been used and perfected throughout the dynasties in China. It is not difficult to see that this system has strong vitality and has played a great positive role in stabilizing the social order. Although there is a great conflict between the ancient system of protection and the recent and modern criminal jurisprudence, which leads to the complete rejection of the system by modern criminal law, it is an important system in the history of criminal law of our country. Its important role and historical significance can not be ignored. On the whole, the system of protecting Koo is a positive legal system in the ancient criminal law of our country. As an excellent cultural heritage, we should carry forward its reasonable elements.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D929

【引证文献】