“广州海珠桥推人案”案例分析

发布时间：2018-04-28 13:04

本文选题：海珠桥事件 + 故意伤害　；参考：《兰州大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 2009年上半年,广州市的海珠桥几乎成了跳桥“胜地”。从4月1日到5月21日50天内,同一座桥上竟上演了12起“跳桥秀”。2009年5月21日早上陈富超爬上海珠桥,开始为自己讨薪。消防,交警迅速赶往现场。交警对海珠桥实施了双向的交通封闭。消防的谈判人员开始与陈富超对话,商讨解决的方式。由于没有满足陈富超的要求,交通被迫堵塞了5个小时。这时61岁的赖健生老人爬上大桥,将陈富超推下,造成跳桥者摔倒在消防气垫上,没有生命危险,但腰椎骨折和右肱骨髁上粉碎性骨折。作为一个极为特殊的个案,老伯的果断出手,引发了两极反应,有人赞老伯“做得好”,也有人认为老伯简直是谋杀。跳桥者原本无意轻生,却搞到受伤,并且广州警方以涉嫌聚众扰乱公共秩序罪对跳桥者陈富超刑事拘留。而赖健生为与自己毫不相干的事情出手,虽然解决了暂时的交通问题,但可能负上法律责任。此事件引来了社会的广泛关注,报纸、网络和电视节目纷纷报道此事,并且进行深入分析和探讨,有关专家学者以及法律界人事也提出自己的观点。本文共分个三部分。第一部分是问题的提出,即广州海珠桥推人事件的过程及对此事件的主要争论。第二部分是对推人事件相关问题的法理分析。这一部分又分为三个部分：对赖某推人行为的法律定性。赖某的行为是否涉嫌犯罪,是否构成见义勇为；陈富超跳桥讨薪的行为是否涉嫌聚众扰乱公共场所秩序罪,以及如何对陈富超处罚的问题；关于跳桥秀维权及其原因的深层思考。第三部分,问题的解决。通过法理的分析,对推人事件中的赖某和陈富超行为进行法律定性。要遏制跳桥秀需要完善相应的信访制度。从这次事件中,我们发现需要完善见义勇为的法律制度。通过对见义勇为立法的分析与研究,笔者认为社会需要的不是专门立法,而是采取其他的方式来保护见义勇为。第一,加强与完善见义勇为相关的奖励与保障制度。第二,呼吁社会各界支持见义勇为基金会,完善见义勇为的民事救济制度。第三,地方政府加快对见义勇为的立法与编纂。第四,政府加强自身能力建设,加强对见义勇为者的保护。
[Abstract]:In the first half of 2009, Guangzhou's Haizhu Bridge almost became a bridge jumping "resort." From April 1 to May 21, there were 12 "bridge jumping shows" on the same bridge. On the morning of May 21, 2009, Chen Fuchao climbed onto the Haizhu Bridge and began to ask for pay for himself. Fire, traffic police rushed to the scene. Traffic police imposed a two-way traffic closure on Haizhu Bridge. Fire-fighting negotiators began a dialogue with Chen Fuchao to discuss a solution. Without meeting Chen Fuchao's requirements, traffic was forced to jam for five hours. Lai Jiansheng, 61, climbed onto the bridge and pushed Chen Fuchao down, causing the jumper to fall on a fire cushion without life threatening, but a lumbar fracture and a comminuted right humeral supracondylar fracture. As a very special case, the old man's decisive action triggered a bipolar reaction, some people praised the old man "well done", others thought the old man was murder. The hopper had no intention of killing himself, but was injured, and Guangzhou police detained Chen Fuchao on suspicion of gathering a crowd to disrupt public order. Lai Jiansheng for his own nothing to do, although the solution to the temporary traffic problems, but may bear legal responsibility. This incident attracted wide attention of the society. Newspapers, networks and television programs reported the matter one after another, and carried out in-depth analysis and discussion. Relevant experts and scholars as well as personnel in the legal profession also put forward their own views. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is the raising of the question, that is, the process of pushing people in Guangzhou Haizhu Bridge and the main controversy about it. The second part is the legal analysis of the problems related to the push event. This part is divided into three parts: the legal characterization of Lai's human behavior. Whether Lai's behavior is suspected of crime, whether it constitutes a brave act, whether Chen Fuchao's behavior of jumping over a bridge and asking for pay is suspected of the crime of gathering a crowd to disturb the public order, and how to punish Chen Fuchao; Deep thinking about the rights of jumping bridge and its causes. The third part, the solution of the problem. Through the analysis of legal theory, the legal characterization of the behavior of Lai and Chen Fuchao is carried out. In order to curb the jump bridge show, we need to improve the corresponding letter and visit system. From this incident, we found that we need to improve the legal system of righteous courage. Through the analysis and research on the legislation of righteous courage, the author thinks that what society needs is not special legislation, but other ways to protect it. First, strengthen and perfect the reward and safeguard system related to brave act of justice. Second, call on all sectors of the community to support the foundation and improve the civil relief system. Third, local governments speed up the legislation and compilation of heroic acts of justice. Fourth, the government should strengthen its own capacity building and strengthen the protection of the righteous.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D920.5

【参考文献】