论法律主体资格
发布时间:2018-05-10 05:00
本文选题:法律主体 + 主体资格 ; 参考:《上海交通大学》2010年硕士论文
【摘要】:法律主体作为一个法律上的概念,是法律理论对立法进行抽象的结果,对于法律主体的理论研究不仅有利于我国的法学理论建设的完善,更有利于主体资格制度的发展。 为了对该问题有一个深刻的阐述与研究,本文首先对法律主体资格作了一个界定,具体分析了法律主体资格的既有学说,同时对法律主体资格从法理逻辑和价值取向两个层面进行了分析,进而得出主体资格功能是为了组织市民社会和分配社会生活资源。接着,又通过对法律主体资格学说的历史考察,特别是罗马法和近代大陆法中关于自然人与法人资格制度的分析,归纳出贯穿其中的自由意志理论。最后,针对目前三类特殊的法律主体资格问题进行有效的讨论和研究。首先,针对死者的法律主体资格问题,根据前述理论以及现有学说,得出不应该将权利义务交由死者承受的结论;其次,针对动物,因其不具备自由意志及相应的行为能力,责任能力,也无法享有作为法律主体的资格;最后,针对“社会”,这种因为公益诉讼而引发的兼具私法性质与公法性质的主体,虽然有具备成为法律主体的可能性与可行性,但是还有很多的问题需要解决,还有相关的制度需要完善。
[Abstract]:As a legal concept, the legal subject is the result of the abstraction of the legislation by the legal theory. The theoretical research on the legal subject is not only conducive to the perfection of the legal theory construction in our country, but also to the development of the subject qualification system. In order to make a profound exposition and research on this problem, this paper firstly defines the qualification of legal subject, and analyzes the existing theories of legal subject qualification. At the same time, the author analyzes the qualification of legal subject from the two aspects of legal logic and value orientation, and concludes that the function of subject qualification is to organize the civil society and distribute the resources of social life. Then, through the historical investigation of the theory of the qualification of legal subject, especially the analysis of the qualification system of natural person and legal person in Roman law and modern continental law, the theory of free will which runs through it is concluded. Finally, three kinds of special legal subject qualification problems are discussed and studied effectively. First, in view of the legal subject qualification of the deceased, according to the above-mentioned theories and existing theories, the conclusion is drawn that rights and obligations should not be handed over to the deceased; secondly, for animals, because they do not have free will and corresponding capacity, Finally, in view of "society", this kind of subject which is both private law and public law caused by public interest litigation has the possibility and feasibility to become a subject of law. But there are still a lot of problems to be solved, there are related systems to be improved.
【学位授予单位】:上海交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D90
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐国栋;;权利能力制度的理想与现实——人法的英特纳雄耐尔之路[J];北方法学;2007年02期
2 江山;法律革命:从传统到超现代——兼谈环境资源法的法理问题[J];比较法研究;2000年01期
3 葛云松;死者生前人格利益的民法保护[J];比较法研究;2002年04期
4 刘国涛;死者生前人格利益民法保护的法理基础——读《死者生前人格利益的民法保护》后的再思考[J];比较法研究;2004年04期
5 徐国栋;“人身关系”流变考(上)[J];法学;2002年06期
6 徐国栋;“人身关系”流变考(下)[J];法学;2002年07期
7 杨立新,朱呈义;动物法律人格之否定——兼论动物之法律“物格”[J];法学研究;2004年05期
8 汉斯·哈腾鲍尔,孙宪忠;民法上的人[J];环球法律评论;2001年04期
9 阿尔多·贝特鲁奇,徐国栋;从身份到契约与罗马的身份制度[J];现代法学;1997年06期
10 江平,龙卫球;法人本质及其基本构造研究——为拟制说辩护[J];中国法学;1998年03期
,本文编号:1867885
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/1867885.html