阿奎那自然法的当代解读

发布时间：2018-05-15 02:36

本文选题：圣·托马斯·阿奎那 + 自然法　；参考：《西南政法大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本文是一篇简述阿奎那自然法在当代发展的短文。风格处于叙述和议论之间。主要论题在于,阿奎那在《神法大全》中创发了一种自然法思想,这种自然法需要置于其对法律本质的论述以及法律种类的考察中进行理解。在上个世纪,随着新托马斯主义的兴起,阿奎那的理论体系重新赢得尊严,受到愈来愈多的学者的青睐。当代在法学研究中出现了一些以阿奎那自然法为论题的研究。这些人都试图以阿奎那的教义建立自己的自然法论。然而,这些理论中哪些是真正坚持了阿奎那自然法思想的?颇具吊诡意味的是,旗帜鲜明地宣称是托马斯主义者的却并未贯彻阿奎那自然法思想,反而是“新”自然法理论家在试图回避这一标签的情况下坚持着阿奎那的立场。争论由此产生。表面看这不过是对阿奎那文本的解释之争,其实从更深层来观察,其中涉及天主教教义正统性问题。本文重点展示了当代几位自然法论者以托马斯主义者的立场阐释的自然法理论以及他们对“新”自然法的批判,并叙述了“新”自然法理论家的回应,然后根据阿奎那的文本对这些回应做了简短评论。全文共分六个部分: 引言部分交代了文章的研究对象,意义以及研究思路。主体部分的第一章是对阿奎那自然法载体的《论法律》中基本自然法问题的解读。指出自然法是与对法律本质的理解密切相关的,以及自然法在阿奎那法律大全中的独特地位。第二章着重介绍了当代几位托马斯主义者以及“新”自然法理论家对阿奎那自然法基本问题的阐述,这一部分是以大致相同的问题展开论述的。第三章承接上一章主要总结了这些对阿奎那自然法阐释的主义分歧之处。以及其他论者对“新”自然法的“围攻”之势。第四章主要论述了“新”自然法对这些批判的回应,并通过回到阿奎那的文本揭示“新”自然法的优势所在。结论部分是本人对阿奎那自然法的一点看法,同时也表达了对“新”自然法信条的赞同。
[Abstract]:This article is a brief description of Aquinas natural law in the contemporary development. Style lies between narration and argumentation. The main point of this thesis is that Aquinas created a kind of natural law thought in the book of God's Law, which needs to be understood in his exposition of the essence of law and in the investigation of the types of law. In the last century, with the rise of New Thomas Doctrine, Aquinas's theory system gained dignity again and was favored by more and more scholars. There are some studies on Aquinas natural law in the contemporary legal research. These people tried to establish their own natural law theory by the doctrine of Aquinas. However, which of these theories really adhere to Aquinas' natural law ideas? Paradoxically, it is the "new" natural law theorist who insists on Aquinas's position when he tries to evade the label, but does not carry out Aquinas' natural law thought in a clear-cut way that is claimed by the Thomas Doctrine. The argument ensued. On the face of it, this is merely a dispute over the interpretation of Aquinas, which, in fact, concerns the orthodoxy of Catholicism. This paper focuses on the theory of natural law interpreted by some contemporary naturalists and their critique of the "new" natural law, and describes the response of the "new" natural law theorists. Then, according to Aquinas text, these responses were briefly commented upon. The full text is divided into six parts: The introduction describes the research object, significance and research ideas of the article. The first chapter of the main part is the interpretation of the basic natural law in Aquinas' Natural Law Carrier. It is pointed out that natural law is closely related to the understanding of the essence of law and its unique position in Aquinas law. The second chapter focuses on the elaboration of the basic problems of Aquinas natural law by several contemporary Thomas idealists and the "new" natural law theorists. The third chapter summarizes the differences in the interpretation of Aquinas' natural law. And other commentators on the "new" natural law of the "siege" trend. The fourth chapter mainly discusses the response of the "new" natural law to these criticisms, and reveals the advantages of the "new" natural law by returning to Aquinas. The conclusion part is my opinion on Aquinas natural law, and also expresses my approval of the "new" natural law creed.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D909.1

【引证文献】