中国司法裁判中的情理研究

发布时间：2018-05-19 15:53

本文选题：情理 + 司法裁判　；参考：《复旦大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】：情理在中国古代司法中有着丰富的生存土壤,并长期在古代法律思想及判案原则中占据主导地位。由于传统法律文化的影响,当代民众在很大程度上仍以情理为价值取向,情理依然在潜移默化地发挥着作用,影响着司法裁判的过程和结果,以致在一些案件的审理和裁判中,经常出现情理与法律之间的紧张和冲突。本文通过分别对古代和当代司法裁判中运用情理的情况进行考察,发现尽管其表现和特点存在许多差异,但都确实存在于不同时代的民众心理和司法实践中,其作用和影响不容忽视。笔者认为,情理的运用对法治建设有利有弊,只有准确把握情理入法的限度,充分发挥情理的积极作用,使情理与法律有机结合,发挥所长,互补互用,才能更好地化解社会矛盾,促进社会和谐,推动法治建设稳步有序地发展。本文除绪论和结论之外,共有三章内容：第一章首先对古代情理的涵义进行解析,并以古代判案资料为背景,对情理在古代司法中的运用及经久不衰的原因进行分析。第二章通过对近期裁判文书和媒体报道的考察,探讨情理在当代司法裁判中是如何运用的,以及与古代相比具有哪些特点。第三章在前文探讨情理运用特点的基础上,着重分析情理对当代法治建设的利弊影响,并进一步对如何协调情理法的关系提出建议。
[Abstract]:Reason has abundant living soil in ancient Chinese judicature, and has long dominated in ancient legal thought and adjudication principle. Because of the influence of the traditional legal culture, the contemporary people still regard the reason as the value orientation to a great extent, and the reason is still playing a role in the process and the result of the judicial decision, which leads to the trial and adjudication of some cases. There is often tension and conflict between reason and law. Based on the investigation of the use of reason in ancient and contemporary judicial decisions, this paper finds that although there are many differences in their performance and characteristics, they do exist in the psychology of the people and judicial practice in different times. Its function and influence cannot be ignored. The author believes that the application of reason has advantages and disadvantages to the construction of the rule of law. Only by accurately grasping the limits of reason into law, giving full play to the positive role of reason and reason, making the organic combination of reason and law, giving play to its advantages and complementing each other, Only then can we better resolve social contradictions, promote social harmony and promote the steady and orderly development of the construction of the rule of law. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, there are three chapters: In the first chapter, the meaning of ancient reason is analyzed, and the application of reason in ancient judicature and the reasons for its persistence are analyzed in the background of ancient judgment data. In the second chapter, through the investigation of recent judicial documents and media reports, the author discusses how to use reason in the contemporary judicial decision and what characteristics it has compared with ancient times. The third chapter discusses the characteristics of the use of reason on the basis of the analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the construction of the contemporary rule of law, and further on how to coordinate the relationship between the law of reason.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D926;D929

【参考文献】