由李某某案析未成年犯罪嫌疑人权益保护问题

发布时间：2018-05-31 07:47

本文选题：未成年人犯罪 + 犯罪嫌疑人　；参考：《湖南大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：2013年李某某等五人强奸案在全国引起轰动，成功入选当年媒体评选的十大刑事案件。本文在简要回顾该案的基本案情、法院判决和事件过程中各方的反映的基础上，选取了案件中三个颇具争议的焦点：一是侦查机关能否在侦查过程中公开案情，二是律师的庭外言论是否应该受到限制，三是媒体的新闻自由权是否应该受到规制，进行深入分析探讨，以未成年犯罪嫌疑人隐私权等合法权益的保护为中心，结合我国法律以及国外的相关做法，对李某某等人强奸案进行评析，并据此提出了自己的一些想法。案中侦查机关、律师、媒体的行为表现并进行法律评价，并据此提出了自己的观点：侦查机关在侦查阶段公布案情，是满足公众知情权的需要，但又会与未成年人隐私权的保护存在矛盾。因此，侦查机关必须在对未成年人犯罪案件进行信息公开时保持谨慎而克制。律师具有应然角色和实然角色，两种角色之间会存在冲突。律师发表庭外言论可能侵犯未成年人的隐私权，并影响被告人获得公正审判的权利，但又可能促进案件的公正审理，并扩大律师的商业价值。因此，律师应从保护未成年人合法权益的角度出发，对其庭外言论进行限制。最后，媒体代表的新闻自由与公正审判是民主社会的两种基本价值，但媒体的新闻自由权应该让位于未成年被告人获得公正审判的权利。同时，媒体的求新求异、不当报道和失真报道，可能形成“舆论压力”，暴露未成年人的隐私，，影响司法公众审判，因此媒体报道时应保持克制。
[Abstract]:In 2013, five rape cases, such as Li and Mou, caused a sensation throughout the country and successfully selected ten major criminal cases selected by the media in the same year. This paper, on the basis of a brief review of the case's basic cases, the court's judgment and the reflection of all parties in the event, selected three controversial focus in the case: one is whether the investigative organ can be in the process of investigation. Open case, two is whether the lawyer's out of court speech should be restricted, three is whether the press freedom of the press should be regulated, in-depth analysis and discussion, taking the protection of the legitimate rights and interests as the privacy of the minor suspects as the center, and combining the laws of our country and the related practices of foreign countries, to comment on the rape cases of Li and so on. Analysis, and accordingly put forward some of their own ideas.
In the case, the investigation organ, the lawyer, the media performance and the legal evaluation, and accordingly put forward their own views: the investigation organs publish the case in the investigation stage, which is the need to meet the public's right to know, but it will also contradict the protection of the minors' right to privacy. Therefore, the investigative organs must believe in the cases of juvenile delinquency. When the interest is open, the lawyer is prudent and restrained. The lawyer has a deserved role and a real role. There will be a conflict between the two roles. The lawyer's out of court speech may infringe on the privacy of the minors and affect the right of the defendant to get a fair trial, but it may also promote the fair trial of the case and expand the commercial value of the lawyer. Therefore, a lawyer From the angle of protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the minors, it is necessary to restrict their out of court speech. Finally, the press freedom and fair trial are the two basic values of the democratic society, but the media's right to press freedom should allow the juvenile defendants to get a fair trial. And distorted reports may lead to "public opinion pressure", exposing the privacy of minors and affecting judicial public trial. Therefore, media reports should be restrained.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2;D920.5

【参考文献】