类型学视野下的中国习惯法研究

发布时间：2018-06-16 06:08

本文选题：类型 + 习惯法　；参考：《广西大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：习惯法的研究是一种跨越法学、社会学、民族学、历史学的综合性研究。近年来我国习惯法取得了长足的发展和一定的成就。但是我国习惯法的研究并未走向“成熟”,反而在进入了研究上的“瓶颈期”。其中最主要的问题是我国的习惯法研究呈现出碎片化,学者们对于研究方法和分析框架的理解各不相同,很难形成有效的对话。如研究方法在传统的文献研究和实证的社会学研究之间还不能达到一种令人满意的融合程度；如在理论建树方面大多简单局限在“寻求国家法与习惯法良性互动”的建议；如我国习惯法研究的分析框架仍然是西方式的,容易简单套用西方理论来解读和分析我国的传统文化等。这些都急需对我国习惯法的研究进行一种外部的、整体上的梳理和反思。类型及类型思维是近年来中国法学界一个较为流行的研究方法,被大多数的学者,尤其是中国传统法律文化研究者所推崇。与传统的规范式、概念式的研究方法相比,类型思维具有其特有的优势,但是不可否认类型思维及方法运用到我国传统法律文化的研究中也有其偏薄和不足之处。本文一方面运用类型思维及类型的方法对于我国习惯法的研究从习惯法的研究方法、分析框架、主要成果等方面进行整体上的梳理和反思,试图对我国目前的习惯法研究进行盘点和反思。另一方面,在认识到类型思维的局限性的基础上,即反对一些法律文化研究学者试图或者不自觉的用西方的术语来解读我国的传统文化、法治实践,从“辩异”式的角度,把西方的法治文化和理论当成一种普适性的标准研究我国丰富的历史传统。在此基础上对我国习惯法的研究进行一些思考,认为我国的习惯法的研究应当从习惯法的内在精神出发,立足中国问题并结合其独特的社会背景进行研究；在研究方法上应当自觉地把法学、社会学、民族学、历史学等不同的研究方法进行整合,走向综合化的研究。
[Abstract]:The study of customary law is a comprehensive study of law, sociology, ethnology and history. In recent years, China's customary law has made considerable progress and certain achievements. However, the study of Chinese customary law is not mature, but has entered the bottleneck period. The most important problem is that the study of customary law in China is fragmented, and scholars have different understanding of the research methods and analytical framework, so it is difficult to form an effective dialogue. For example, the research method can not achieve a satisfactory degree of fusion between the traditional literature research and the empirical sociological research, for example, in the theoretical construction, most of the research methods are simply confined to the suggestion of "seeking benign interaction between state law and customary law". For example, the analytical framework of the study of customary law in China is still western-style, and it is easy to apply western theories to interpret and analyze the traditional culture of our country. All these are in urgent need of an external, overall carding and reflection on the study of Chinese customary law. Type and type thinking is a popular research method in Chinese legal circles in recent years, which is respected by most scholars, especially the researchers of Chinese traditional legal culture. Compared with the traditional normative and conceptual research methods, the type thinking has its unique advantages, but it is undeniable that the type thinking and method applied to the study of Chinese traditional legal culture also has its weakness and shortcomings. On the one hand, this article uses the type thinking and the type method to study the customary law of our country from the common law research method, the analysis frame, the main achievement and so on, carries on the overall combing and the reflection, so on the aspect and so on. This paper attempts to take stock of and reflect on the current study of customary law in China. On the other hand, on the basis of recognizing the limitation of type thinking, that is to say, some scholars of legal culture try or unconsciously interpret the traditional culture of our country with western terminology, the practice of the rule of law, from the angle of "differentiating different". Regard the western culture and theory of rule of law as a universal standard to study the rich historical tradition of our country. On the basis of this, the author thinks that the study of customary law in our country should proceed from the inner spirit of customary law, be based on Chinese problems and combine with its unique social background. In terms of research methods, we should consciously integrate different research methods such as law, sociology, ethnology, history and so on.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D920.4

【参考文献】