中国古代判例特征及其功能分析

发布时间：2018-07-03 04:25

本文选题：古代判例 + 成文法　；参考：《烟台大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 判例在中国古代有着悠久的传统,是中国传统法律中一种重要的法律形式,它以其自身灵活、适时、直观等成文法所不具备的优点在历代司法实践中起着补充、变通、发展和完善律的作用。我们应当认真对待判例这一宝贵文化遗产,充分挖掘其中的有益内容,自觉摒弃其中的负面因素,在此基础上,理性构建当今中国的法律体系。本文从厘清中国古代判例的发展脉络入手,分析判例的特征、成因、功能,总结古代判例给我们的启示。文章主要分四个部分进行研究。第一章追寻了中国古代判例制度的历史。中国古代比较重视成文法的制定工作,逐步形成了以法典为核心的法律体系。同时各朝又创造了例等法律形式作为制定法的补充。本章先后从先秦时期、秦汉时期、隋唐时期、宋元时期、明清时期五个阶段理清古代判例的历史沿革。第二章论述中国古代判例的特征及成因。主要分为三个部分,分别论述了皇权是我国古代判例效力之源,礼制是古代判例制度之魂,指出判例在古代法中的地位,即以律为依据和前提,对制定法起辅助和补充作用。第三章论述中国古代判例的功能。判例的政治功能主要是对封建专制统治的维护、对封建法制原则的维护和对封建礼制价值的维护;法律功能则体现在阐述法律精神,改造成文法和补成文法之不足。第四章讨论我国古代判例制度的启示。立足我国古代判例的本土资源,总结经验,为我国当代判例制度的建设提供反思和借鉴。本文的创新之处在于利用历史分析法、比较研究法、文化研究法将我国不同历史阶段的判例进行比较,并运用大量古代判例进行观点论证,以古鉴今,为当下法治建设提供传统资源的支持。
[Abstract]:Case law has a long tradition in ancient China, and it is an important legal form in Chinese traditional law. It has the advantages of flexibility, timeliness, intuitionistic and so on. It is complementary and flexible in the judicial practice of the past dynasties. The function of developing and perfecting the law. We should take the valuable cultural heritage of precedent seriously, fully excavate its beneficial contents, consciously abandon the negative factors, and on this basis, rationally construct the legal system of China today. This paper analyzes the characteristics, causes and functions of Chinese ancient cases, and summarizes the enlightenment of ancient cases. The article is divided into four parts. The first chapter traces the history of Chinese ancient precedent system. In ancient China, more attention was paid to the enactment of statute law, which gradually formed the legal system with the code as the core. At the same time, each dynasty also created examples and other forms of law as a complement to the law. This chapter clarifies the historical evolution of ancient precedents from five periods: pre-Qin, Qin and Han dynasties, Sui and Tang dynasties, Song and Yuan dynasties, and Ming and Qing dynasties. The second chapter discusses the characteristics and causes of ancient Chinese jurisprudence. It is mainly divided into three parts, which respectively discuss that imperial power is the source of the validity of the ancient case law in our country, and the etiquette system is the soul of the ancient precedent system, and points out the position of the case law in ancient law, that is, taking the law as the basis and premise, it plays an auxiliary and supplementary role in the formulation of the law. The third chapter discusses the function of ancient Chinese jurisprudence. The political function of case law is mainly to maintain the feudal autocratic rule, the principle of feudal legal system and the value of feudal ritual system, while the legal function is to expound the spirit of law, to reform the statutory law and to supplement the deficiency of written law. The fourth chapter discusses the enlightenment of the ancient case system of our country. Based on the local resources of our country's ancient precedents and summing up our experience, we can provide reflection and reference for the construction of our country's contemporary precedent system. The innovation of this paper lies in the use of historical analysis, comparative research and cultural research to compare the precedents in different historical stages of our country, and to use a large number of ancient cases to demonstrate the point of view in order to learn from the past and the present. To provide the support of traditional resources for the construction of the current rule of law.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D929

【引证文献】