“例外”与“常规”的争执——施米特与凯尔森法哲学比较研究
发布时间：2018-07-25 19:29
【摘要】：施米特的法哲学思想以"例外"(Ausnahme)为标志,凯尔森的法哲学思想以"基础规范"(Grundnorm)、"常规"(Norm)为标志。两者之间的冲突,远非20世纪30年代"谁是宪法的守护者"那场论战所能涵盖。除了"宪法的守护者"之争外,两人还有更深层次的冲突:启示与理性以及圣经旧约与新约的冲突。这一冲突恰恰昭示出现代法哲学与政治哲学的最核心问题——实际也是西方思想的关键问题!施米特没有回避这一思想争执,他创建的政治宪法学,将凯尔森的纯粹法思想融入到自己的法哲学理论之中,从而既保留了启蒙运动以来的"理性"地位;又以"例外"昭示现代人:"启示"并没有被"理性"所击溃。
[Abstract]:Schmitt's philosophy of law is marked by "exceptional" (Ausnahme), and Kelsen's is marked by "basic norm" (Grundnorm), "conventional" (Norm). The conflict is far from covered by the 1930 s who is the Keeper of the Constitution. In addition to the "Guardian of the Constitution" dispute, the two men have a deeper conflict: revelation and reason and the conflict between the Old Testament and the New Testament. This conflict just shows the most core problem of modern philosophy of law and political philosophy-the reality is also the key problem of western thought! Schmitt did not avoid this ideological dispute. His political constitutional jurisprudence incorporated Kelsen's pure legal thought into his own legal philosophy theory, thus retaining the "rational" status since the Enlightenment. "exception" also shows modern people that "revelation" has not been defeated by "reason".
【作者单位】： 同济大学人文学院;
【分类号】：D90
[Abstract]:Schmitt's philosophy of law is marked by "exceptional" (Ausnahme), and Kelsen's is marked by "basic norm" (Grundnorm), "conventional" (Norm). The conflict is far from covered by the 1930 s who is the Keeper of the Constitution. In addition to the "Guardian of the Constitution" dispute, the two men have a deeper conflict: revelation and reason and the conflict between the Old Testament and the New Testament. This conflict just shows the most core problem of modern philosophy of law and political philosophy-the reality is also the key problem of western thought! Schmitt did not avoid this ideological dispute. His political constitutional jurisprudence incorporated Kelsen's pure legal thought into his own legal philosophy theory, thus retaining the "rational" status since the Enlightenment. "exception" also shows modern people that "revelation" has not been defeated by "reason".
【作者单位】： 同济大学人文学院;
【分类号】：D90
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姜丽丽 ,周士新;浅析美国和伊斯兰世界的矛盾根源[J];阿拉伯世界;2004年06期
2 钱雪梅;;巴基斯坦塔利班现象解析[J];阿拉伯世界研究;2011年02期
3 周博文;国家主权的相对性与绝对性[J];鞍山科技大学学报;2003年02期
4 高全喜;;宪法与革命及中国宪制问题[J];北大法律评论;2010年02期
5 刘练军;;基本法的功能性与开放性及其启示——《联邦德国宪法纲要》读后[J];北方法学;2010年02期
6 湛中乐;谢珂s，
本文编号：2144838
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2144838.html
