政权运行中合法性的延伸判断
发布时间：2018-08-12 09:53
【摘要】：政权合法性判断实际上分为两个层面:社会对主权的合法性认同,以及此后对所构建的政权进行合法性的检验。基于第二个层面,经过民主授权的政权还要受到法治原则的控制,背后隐含的是作为主权者的人民对运行中的政权进行合法性追问。但是,当法治规范受到权力的控制,合法性判断就会在形式法治的过程中分解,实质民主意志就会因为权力对法治话语的控制而被"僭越"。要解决政权运行过程中,对合法性的延伸判断问题,就要完善交往程序,整合多元利益诉求,克服权力的压制模式,实现真实妥协。
[Abstract]:In fact, the legitimacy judgment of political power is divided into two levels: the legitimacy identity of the society to sovereignty, and the test of legitimacy of the regime constructed thereafter. Based on the second level, the democratically authorized regime is also controlled by the principle of rule of law, which implies that the people, as a sovereign, question the legitimacy of the regime in operation. However, when the rule of law is controlled by power, the judgment of legitimacy will decompose in the process of formal rule of law, and the substantive democratic will be "overtaken" by the control of power over the discourse of rule of law. In order to solve the problem of extending and judging legitimacy in the process of regime operation, we should perfect the communication procedure, integrate the demands of multiple interests, overcome the oppressive mode of power, and realize true compromise.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学法学院;
【分类号】：D90
本文编号：2178697
[Abstract]:In fact, the legitimacy judgment of political power is divided into two levels: the legitimacy identity of the society to sovereignty, and the test of legitimacy of the regime constructed thereafter. Based on the second level, the democratically authorized regime is also controlled by the principle of rule of law, which implies that the people, as a sovereign, question the legitimacy of the regime in operation. However, when the rule of law is controlled by power, the judgment of legitimacy will decompose in the process of formal rule of law, and the substantive democratic will be "overtaken" by the control of power over the discourse of rule of law. In order to solve the problem of extending and judging legitimacy in the process of regime operation, we should perfect the communication procedure, integrate the demands of multiple interests, overcome the oppressive mode of power, and realize true compromise.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学法学院;
【分类号】：D90
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈晓枫;毕玉玲;;更新与沉淀——《钦定宪法大纲》颁布百年之际的反思[J];法学评论;2008年06期
2 范忠信;君权监督与和平转移:中国传统法学的盲点[J];河北法学;1999年06期
3 廖宗麟;汪树民;;从《唐律疏议》的局限性看中华法系发展的特点[J];河池学院学报;2007年01期
4 高昌勃;;当代中国政治合法化能力浅析[J];西南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2010年03期
5 任海涛;;《论语》中的宪法思想萌芽及其与西方比较[J];政治与法律;2010年07期
6 陈刚;有关合法性概念及中国古代君权合法性的几点思考[J];哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版);2000年01期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2178697
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2178697.html
