论民国时期收复司法主权的法理抗争

发布时间：2018-08-12 19:24

【摘要】：一国的司法权为内政,司法主权则属外交。按照国际法准则,在对外交往中,主权高于一切。近代中国,西方列强为了长期享有在华司法特权即领事裁判权,不断编织法理藉口。1843年以降的近百年时间内,为了收复司法主权,国人不断进行法理抗争,民国时期,趋于高潮。国人的法理抗争给西方列强增加了压力,给政府增添了动力,促进了国人的司法内省,推动了司法主权的恢复,也为中国政府在国际舞台上争取其他法律权益积累了经验。而今一些西方强国时常凭借所谓法理依据,干涉别国内政,侵犯别国司法主权,该行径实为近代领事裁判权的翻版,任何主权独立国家既要在法理上加以驳斥、抗争,更要在行动上坚决抵制,捍卫国家主权。
[Abstract]:The judicial power of a country is internal affairs, and judicial sovereignty belongs to diplomacy. In accordance with the norms of international law, sovereignty is paramount in foreign relations. In modern China, in order to enjoy judicial privilege in China for a long time, that is, consular jurisdiction, Western powers constantly weave legal excuses. In 1843, in order to recover judicial sovereignty, the Chinese people continued to fight against legal theory, and during the period of the Republic of China, Tend to climax. The people's legal theory struggle has increased the pressure to the western powers, increased the power to the government, promoted the judicial introspection of the people, promoted the restoration of judicial sovereignty, and accumulated experience for the Chinese government to fight for other legal rights and interests on the international stage. Nowadays, some Western powers often rely on the so-called legal basis to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries and infringe upon the judicial sovereignty of other countries. This act is in fact a copy of the consular jurisdiction in modern times. Any sovereign independent country should refute and fight against it in terms of legal theory. Moreover, we must resolutely resist in action and safeguard national sovereignty.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;
【基金】：南京大学法学院“985工程”三期项目“社会转型与法治发展”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D929

【相似文献】