当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法史论文 >

目的解释方法及其适用研究

发布时间:2018-08-13 18:37
【摘要】: 本文由五个部分组成。其中,引言部分第一节介绍了研究问题在于通过目的解释方法的适用,如何使法律文本的主观目的与客观目的相融合,而当二者发生冲突的情形时,应当优先选择主观目的,但是客观目的在特定情形下可以具有更强分量。第二节对文章的研究进路做了具体说明。 第一章是关于目的解释的基本内涵,目的解释的目标是实现法律文本意欲实现之目的,而此目的是建立在文本作者意图与法律体系之意图基础上的。目的解释作为一种解释方法,在确定案件所适用的法律规范过程中,即在寻找大前提的过程中,目的解释通过有机融合法规之主观目的与客观目的,能够为法官对所确定适用的法律规范提供有力的证成。此外,融合了主观性与客观性的目的解释,可以有效避免主观目的解释学说与客观目的解释学说单独适用时的偏颇。 第二章是目的解释的适用基础,即如何确定法律文本的主观目的与客观目的,共分为三节来讨论。法律文本的语义学上的意义是目的解释的方向指标,同时划定了解释的界限;按照法律文本类型的不同,其各自的主观目的各有不同的表述形式,并重点讨论了成文法规的主观目的——立法者意图;文本的客观目的是解释者所预设的目的,反映了既定时间内、既定的社会需求。客观目的之内容不是固定不变的,其具体意义取决于作出解释时的利益、价值等等。 第三章进入到目的解释适用准则的问题研究中,第一节讨论了目的解释的适用标准,目的解释方法应当实现法律决定的可预测性与可接受性,而第二节讨论了目的解释适用准则的独特性,法律文本的主观目的、客观目的转化为可以辩驳的命题,目的解释最重要的任务就在于有机融合这些主观目的、客观目的。当此二者发生冲突时,主观目的具有优先考量的决定地位,但是只是相对的,在特定情形下客观目的得到更有利理由支持,其分量重于主观目的。 结语部分指出法律解释的重要意义在于研究解释方法的具体适用,在目的解释看来,法律解释的过程是从法律文本的语义学意义中抽取出法律意义,此过程需要综合考量主观目的与客观目的。
[Abstract]:This paper consists of five parts. The first section of the introduction introduces the problem of how to combine the subjective purpose and objective purpose of the legal text through the application of the method of purpose interpretation, and when the two conflicts, the subjective purpose should be preferred. But the objective purpose can have a stronger component under certain circumstances. The second section makes a specific explanation to the research route of the article. Chapter one is about the basic connotation of Skopos interpretation, the aim of which is to realize the intention of the legal text, which is based on the intention of the author of the text and the intention of the legal system. Objective interpretation as a method of interpretation, in the process of determining the legal norms applicable to the case, that is, in the process of searching for the major premise, the purpose of interpretation through the organic integration of the subjective and objective purposes of laws and regulations. Be able to provide strong evidence for the judge to determine the applicable legal norms. In addition, the objective interpretation of subjectivity and objectivity can effectively avoid the bias between the subjective purpose interpretation theory and the objective purpose interpretation theory. The second chapter is the application basis of the purpose explanation, that is, how to determine the subjective purpose and objective purpose of the legal text, which is divided into three sections to discuss. The semantic meaning of the legal text is the directional index of the purpose interpretation, and at the same time it delimits the boundary of the interpretation, according to the different types of the legal text, its subjective purpose has different forms of expression. The objective purpose of the text is the presupposition of the interpreter and reflects the established social needs within a given period of time, and the paper focuses on the subjective purpose of the written law, the intention of the legislator, and the objective purpose of the text, which is the presupposition of the interpreter. The content of objective purpose is not fixed, its specific meaning depends on the interest, value and so on. Chapter III enters into the study of the criteria for the application of the purpose interpretation. Section I discusses the applicable criteria for the purpose interpretation, and the method of purpose interpretation should achieve the predictability and acceptability of legal decisions. The second section discusses the uniqueness of the criterion of purpose interpretation, the subjective purpose of the legal text, and the objective purpose transformed into a refutable proposition. The most important task of the purpose interpretation lies in the organic integration of these subjective purposes and objective purposes. When the two conflicts, the subjective purpose has the decisive position of priority, but only relatively, the objective purpose is supported by more favorable reasons under certain circumstances, and its weight is more important than the subjective purpose. The conclusion points out that the significance of legal interpretation lies in the concrete application of interpretation methods. In the view of purpose interpretation, the process of legal interpretation is to extract the legal meaning from the semantic meaning of the legal text. This process requires comprehensive consideration of subjective and objective purposes.
【学位授予单位】:中国政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2009
【分类号】:D90

【引证文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 王宜珂;;浅析法律解释的漏洞补充功能[J];商业文化(上半月);2011年07期

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 李元媛;论刑事审判中的目的解释[D];苏州大学;2011年

2 郭瑞莲;条约目的解释方法在WTO框架下的适用研究[D];山东大学;2012年



本文编号:2181837

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2181837.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户85b3d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com