论美国对华反倾销中的非市场经济规则及其滥用
[Abstract]:The first chapter briefly introduces the history of American anti-dumping from the angle of legal history. This part first introduces the theory of dumping and the origin of anti-dumping legislation. The second part introduces the history of anti-dumping legislation in the United States. At the end of this part, the author briefly introduces the current anti-dumping procedural law and substantive law in the United States. The second chapter mainly introduces the emergence and development of non-market economy rules of anti-dumping in the United States. This part first introduces the emergence and development of non-market economy rules of international anti-dumping, and introduces the economic and historical political reasons for the emergence of non-market economy problems at the international level. Secondly, this part introduces the emergence, development and final formation of the non-market economy rules of the United States anti-dumping, and introduces the new attempt of the United States to the non-market economy rules of the countries in transition. The third chapter of this paper studies the current non-market economy rules in the United States. This part first introduces the definition and standards of non-market economy countries and the relevant rules of procedure. The second part introduces the individual tax rate rules in the non-market economy rules of the United States, studies the difference between the national uniform tax rate and the individual tax rate, and the test method of the individual tax rate. Related issues such as joint tax rates and tax rates of non-compulsory responding enterprises that have passed separate tests. At the end of this part, the calculation method of normal value is introduced, the choice of surrogate country, the calculation of normal value according to production factor method and other related problems are studied. Chapter four studies the abuse of non-market economy rules in American anti-dumping against China. The author first analyzes the overall influence of the abuse of non-market economy rules in the United States on Chinese enterprises by using the method of data comparison, and then studies each aspect of the abuse of non-market economy rules in the United States, and adds data analysis and cases. In this part, the author first studies the reasons why the United States refuses to give China market economy treatment and reasonably predicts that the United States will not give China market economy treatment ahead of time. In the second part, the author studies the abuse behavior of the American Department of Commerce, which refuses to recognize Chinese industry as a market-oriented industry department and unlawfully modifies the separate tax rate rules to increase the difficulty for Chinese enterprises to obtain separate tax rates. In the end of this part, the abuse behavior of the US Department of Commerce in calculating the normal value of the products under investigation is studied, and a case of anti-dumping investigation of some polyester staple fibers in China by an enterprise in Zhejiang Province is introduced in detail. The fifth chapter focuses on China's strategy to deal with the abuse of non-market economy rules in the United States. The first strategy put forward in this part is that the Chinese government should change its concept, actively use the dispute settlement mechanism of WTO to stop the abuse of the non-market economy rules in the United States, and accelerate the demise of the non-market economy rules. Secondly, this part discusses the possibility of Chinese enterprises breaking through the shackles of non-market economy rules by using foreign investment, and analyzes the feasibility and concrete operation of Chinese enterprises using foreign investment to shape suitable surrogate countries.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D996.1;DD912.29;D971.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴振宇;;欧盟对华反倾销中市场经济问题浅析[J];法制与社会;2008年03期
2 张新娟;;欧盟反倾销法非市场经济规则研究[J];法学家;2003年06期
3 吴秋芬;;浅谈欧盟反倾销法中的非市场经济问题[J];中国高新技术企业;2007年03期
4 信虎强;彭剑波;;发展中国家对华反倾销的现状、原因及对策探析[J];法制与经济(下半月);2007年11期
5 王晓非;欧盟对华反倾销实践中的不合理因素及对策选择[J];党政干部学刊;2005年01期
6 黄娟;;中美贸易摩擦浅论[J];求实;2006年S3期
7 陶明;邓竞魁;;美国对华“反补贴”贸易策略的选择研究[J];理论界;2009年11期
8 潘悦;美国对华反倾销:特征与走势[J];太平洋学报;2005年06期
9 贾琳;;入世后美国对华经贸政策的两面性[J];红旗文稿;2003年17期
10 冯学智;中国企业应对反倾销实体策略分析[J];甘肃理论学刊;2005年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 秦永和;秦臻;;反倾销会计——美国对华反倾销预警模型研究[A];中国会计学会2007年学术年会论文集(上册)[C];2007年
2 于津平;郭晓菁;;对华反倾销的宏观经济与政治因素研究[A];江苏省外国经济学说研究会2010年学术年会论文集[C];2010年
3 沈国兵;;美国对华反倾销的主要决定因素及其影响效应:经验研究[A];上海市社会科学界第五届学术年会文集(2007年度)(经济·管理学科卷)[C];2007年
4 侯淑波;;市场经济地位:消除国际对华反倾销不公正性的关键[A];《WTO法与中国论坛》文集——中国法学会世界贸易组织法研究会年会论文集(四)[C];2005年
5 侯淑波;;市场经济地位:消除国际对华反倾销不公正性的关键[A];《WTO法与中国论坛》文集——中国法学会世界贸易组织法研究会年会论文集(三)[C];2004年
6 吴小琛;;美国对华反倾销九月无战事[A];中华全国律师协会WTO专门委员会2005年年会会议手册[C];2005年
7 王雪华;;我国面临的贸易争端形势与对策[A];中华全国律师协会WTO专门委员会2005年年会会议手册[C];2005年
8 王磊;成坤;;加入WTO以来的中欧贸易摩擦——法律框架与典型案例[A];《WTO法与中国论坛》文集——中国法学会世界贸易组织法研究会年会论文集(七)[C];2008年
9 杨仕辉;李文憬;;中美贸易摩擦特点、原因及中美经贸关系展望[A];“美国经济中长期趋势及其对中美经贸关系的影响”研讨会论文集[C];2006年
10 王磊;成坤;;加入WTO以来的中欧盟贸易摩擦——法律框架与典型案例[A];中国法学会世界贸易组织法研究会二○○七年年会论文集[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 孙楠;俄白哈对华反倾销并非主流[N];国际商报;2011年
2 ;2003年美国9次对华反倾销[N];中国质量报;2004年
3 记者 裴s,
本文编号:2222719
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2222719.html