关于“费列罗案”的案例分析

发布时间：2018-10-09 10:22

【摘要】： 改革开放三十多年以来,随着我国社会主义市场经济逐步成熟,我国的商品经济得到了长足发展,涌现出了许多的知名商品,使我国的自主品牌在国际舞台上也有了强劲的竞争力。竞争是经济活动的常态,是商品经济的本质属性。正当的、有规则的竞争会给经济发展起到催化剂的作用,它要求竞争者之间必须地位平等,同时遵守公平、诚实信用的基本法则,但实践中,由于经济利益的巨大诱惑,有部分竞争者违反市场竞争原则,破坏了竞争的有序性。知名商品是混淆行为的最大受害者,目前我国对知名商品的法律保护,主要体现在《反不正当竞争法》中,但该法的规定比较宽泛,对细节问题的规定并没有很好的体现出来。所以,对知名商品及其法律保护的研究有重要的实践价值。不正当竞争行为中最为常见的侵权行为就是混淆行为,本文讨论的费列罗公司诉蒙特莎公司不正当竞争案就是混淆行为中擅自使用与知名商品近似的特有包装、装潢的典型案例。本文共分三个部分：第一部分为案例简介,主要介绍涉案双方的背景和三级审理法院的审理结果及其依据。第二部分是法理分析,也是本文的重点,主要介绍与知名商品相混淆行为的四个构成条件；讨论什么是知名商品及其判定；论述知名商品的包装、装潢的特有性和地域范围问题：明确商品销售时间和在先知名的关系。第三部分是对本案侵权认定的思考。
[Abstract]:After more than 30 years of reform and opening up, with the gradual maturation of our socialist market economy, the commodity economy of our country has been greatly developed, and many well-known commodities have emerged. China's independent brand in the international arena also has a strong competitiveness. Competition is the normal state of economic activity and the essential attribute of commodity economy. It is true that regular competition will act as a catalyst for economic development, requiring equal status among competitors, while abiding by the basic principles of fairness and good faith, but in practice, due to the great temptation of economic interests, Some competitors violate the principle of market competition and undermine the order of competition. Well-known commodities are the biggest victims of confusion. At present, the legal protection of well-known commodities in China is mainly reflected in the Anti-unfair Competition Law, but the provisions of this law are broad, and the provisions on details are not well reflected. Therefore, the research on famous commodities and its legal protection has important practical value. The most common infringing act in unfair competition is confusion. The case of Ferrero Company v. the unfair Competition of Montessori in this paper is to use the special packaging similar to well-known goods without authorization in the act of confusion. A typical case of decoration. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part is a case brief, mainly introduces the background of the parties involved, the trial results of the three-level trial court and its basis. The second part is the legal analysis, which is also the focus of this paper, mainly introduces the four constituent conditions of the behavior of confusion with well-known commodities; discusses what is well-known goods and their judgment; discusses the packaging of well-known commodities, Unique and geographical scope of decoration: clear sales time and prior well-known relationship. The third part is the thinking of the tort in this case.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D920.5

【相似文献】