我国企业在美应诉出口价格固定案进展及对策研究
发布时间：2018-10-15 18:23
【摘要】：金融危机背景下贸易保护主义有所抬头、反垄断法域外适用的单边主义增强和私人诉讼的巨额赔偿刺激是美国反垄断法频繁域外适用的主要动因,应从企业、行业协会和国家层面采取积极措施,形成联动应对机制,有效应对美国反垄断法律风险,保护我国出口企业的利益。为应对风险及挑战,需要我国企业、行业协会和政府互相配合,建立系统的预警和应对机制以有效应对,建议企业层面:规避反垄断法域外适用风险;积极应对反垄断指挥;建立出口数据指标库,协助构建反垄断预警机制。行业协会层面:建立科学完善的反垄断预警机制,规避式降低反垄断域外适用风险;增强协调组织服务能力,协助企业应对反垄断指挥。国家层面:细化和制定出口长特尔豁免制度、登记制度;出口阻却性法规应对美国反垄断法域外适用;针对影响我国的外国出口卡特尔制定调查和诉讼制度。
[Abstract]:Under the background of the financial crisis, trade protectionism is on the rise. The enhancement of unilateralism in the extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law and the huge compensation stimulus of private litigation are the main reasons for the frequent extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law in the United States. Trade associations and national level take active measures to form a linkage mechanism to effectively deal with the American anti-monopoly legal risks and protect the interests of our export enterprises. In order to deal with the risks and challenges, it is necessary for Chinese enterprises, trade associations and governments to cooperate with each other and establish a systematic early warning and response mechanism to deal with them effectively. Establish export data index database to help build anti-monopoly warning mechanism. The level of trade association: establish a scientific and perfect antitrust warning mechanism, reduce the risk of anti-monopoly extraterritorial application, strengthen the ability of coordinating organization and service, and assist enterprises to deal with anti-monopoly command. At the national level: the system of exemption and registration should be refined and formulated; the laws and regulations of export resistance should apply to the extraterritorial application of American anti-monopoly law; and the investigation and litigation system should be established against the foreign export cartels that affect our country.
【作者单位】： 重庆大学法学院(四川外语学院国际商学院);
【基金】：重庆市涉外企业贸易权益保护中心重大课题攻关项目“外国反垄断法对我国企业贸易权益的侵害及法律对策研究”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F752.02;D971.2
[Abstract]:Under the background of the financial crisis, trade protectionism is on the rise. The enhancement of unilateralism in the extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law and the huge compensation stimulus of private litigation are the main reasons for the frequent extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law in the United States. Trade associations and national level take active measures to form a linkage mechanism to effectively deal with the American anti-monopoly legal risks and protect the interests of our export enterprises. In order to deal with the risks and challenges, it is necessary for Chinese enterprises, trade associations and governments to cooperate with each other and establish a systematic early warning and response mechanism to deal with them effectively. Establish export data index database to help build anti-monopoly warning mechanism. The level of trade association: establish a scientific and perfect antitrust warning mechanism, reduce the risk of anti-monopoly extraterritorial application, strengthen the ability of coordinating organization and service, and assist enterprises to deal with anti-monopoly command. At the national level: the system of exemption and registration should be refined and formulated; the laws and regulations of export resistance should apply to the extraterritorial application of American anti-monopoly law; and the investigation and litigation system should be established against the foreign export cartels that affect our country.
【作者单位】： 重庆大学法学院(四川外语学院国际商学院);
【基金】：重庆市涉外企业贸易权益保护中心重大课题攻关项目“外国反垄断法对我国企业贸易权益的侵害及法律对策研究”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F752.02;D971.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 陈力;;海牙取证公约在我国涉外民商事审判中的适用[J];东方法学;2010年01期
2 郑鹏程;;美国反垄断法三倍损害赔偿制度研究[J];环球法律评论;2006年02期
3 孟雁北;反垄断法视野中的行业协会[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2004年03期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 董新凯;俞佳;;论反垄断法中的民事责任[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年06期
2 盛杰民;焦海涛;;论中国反垄断法对行业协会的规制[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2008年04期
3 玄玉宝;;简论美国反托拉斯法私人实施及我国取向[J];研究生法学;2008年05期
4 夏艺菡;;论美国反托拉斯法私人执行制度对我国执法的启示[J];当代经济;2011年13期
5 王健;;反垄断法私人执行的优越性及其实现——兼论中国反垄断法引入私人执行制度的必要性和立法建议[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年04期
6 陈洁;;反垄断法私人执行的集团公益诉讼模式[J];太原师范学院学报(社会科学版);2011年03期
7 孙晋;;我国《反垄断法》法律责任制度的缺失及其完善[J];法律适用;2009年11期
8 夏利民;;行业协会反垄断法规制的法律思考[J];法学杂志;2006年06期
9 孙s，
本文编号：2273434
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2273434.html
