中德器官移植立法比较研究
发布时间：2018-11-06 12:18
【摘要】：器官移植技术的迅速发展给器官疾病患者带来了福音。虽然我国的器官移植医学临床起步较晚，但器官移植技术的进步相对较快。尤其是近年来，我国的器官移植技术发展迅速，规模扩大。然而于此相对，尽管我国在器官移植的医学实践方面已经跨入世界先进领域，但对器官移植的法律研究和相关立法却比较滞后，这一点导致了人体器官在摘取、移植的过程中面临着许多需要解决的法律问题和需要完善的法律空白地带。鉴于此我国立法机关可以借鉴国外的立法经验，在现有的器官移植相关法律法规的基础上，进一步制定器官移植和器官捐献统一的法律来完善器官移植的法律体系，以推动我国器官移植事业的健康发展，挽救更多患者的生命。 本选题分为三个部分。第一部分从立法目的、立法适用范围以及法律基本原则对中德器官移植法的一般规定进行比较。第二部分对中德器官移植法的基本制度分别予以介绍，进行供体、受体范围、医生说明义务、捐赠者同意等方面的对比。第三部分是对中德器官移植法法律责任的比较分析。每一部分中都对我国立法需改进的地方提出了本文的见解与建议。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of organ transplantation technology brings good news to patients with organ diseases. Although the clinical application of organ transplantation medicine in China is relatively late, the progress of organ transplantation technology is relatively rapid. Especially in recent years, organ transplantation technology in China has developed rapidly and expanded in scale. However, in contrast, although our country has stepped into the advanced field of medical practice of organ transplantation in the world, the legal research and relevant legislation on organ transplantation are lagging behind, which has led to the removal of human organs. In the process of transplantation, there are many legal problems and gaps that need to be solved. In view of this, the legislature of our country can learn from the legislative experience of foreign countries, and on the basis of the existing laws and regulations on organ transplantation, we can further formulate a unified law on organ transplantation and organ donation to perfect the legal system of organ transplantation. In order to promote the healthy development of organ transplantation in China, save more patients' lives. This topic is divided into three parts. The first part compares the general provisions of Chinese and German organ transplantation law from the legislative purpose, the scope of application of legislation and the basic principles of law. The second part introduces the basic system of organ transplantation in China and Germany, compares donor, recipient range, doctor's obligation of explanation, donor's consent and so on. The third part is the comparative analysis of the legal liability of organ transplantation between China and Germany. In each part, the author puts forward some opinions and suggestions for the improvement of our country's legislation.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.16;D951.6
本文编号：2314237
[Abstract]:The rapid development of organ transplantation technology brings good news to patients with organ diseases. Although the clinical application of organ transplantation medicine in China is relatively late, the progress of organ transplantation technology is relatively rapid. Especially in recent years, organ transplantation technology in China has developed rapidly and expanded in scale. However, in contrast, although our country has stepped into the advanced field of medical practice of organ transplantation in the world, the legal research and relevant legislation on organ transplantation are lagging behind, which has led to the removal of human organs. In the process of transplantation, there are many legal problems and gaps that need to be solved. In view of this, the legislature of our country can learn from the legislative experience of foreign countries, and on the basis of the existing laws and regulations on organ transplantation, we can further formulate a unified law on organ transplantation and organ donation to perfect the legal system of organ transplantation. In order to promote the healthy development of organ transplantation in China, save more patients' lives. This topic is divided into three parts. The first part compares the general provisions of Chinese and German organ transplantation law from the legislative purpose, the scope of application of legislation and the basic principles of law. The second part introduces the basic system of organ transplantation in China and Germany, compares donor, recipient range, doctor's obligation of explanation, donor's consent and so on. The third part is the comparative analysis of the legal liability of organ transplantation between China and Germany. In each part, the author puts forward some opinions and suggestions for the improvement of our country's legislation.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.16;D951.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 申卫星,王琦;论人体器官捐献与移植的立法原则[J];比较法研究;2005年04期
2 张锋,任静远;澳门有关人体器官和组织捐献、摘取及移植的法律制度[J];法律与医学杂志;2000年03期
3 刘长秋,陈占彪;论我国器官移植立法过程中应坚持的基本原则[J];法律与医学杂志;2005年01期
4 刘长秋;赵志毅;;人体器官买卖与捐献的法律分析[J];法律与医学杂志;2007年01期
5 陈林林;;基于法律原则的裁判[J];法学研究;2006年03期
6 邵泽春;;生态经济发展法律保障机制的创新[J];理论月刊;2011年01期
7 熊永明;;论死亡标准的冲突对刑法适用的影响——兼评我国死亡标准的取舍[J];南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版);2010年02期
8 熊永明;;摘取尸体器官涉及的刑法问题[J];法学论坛;2008年06期
9 刘长秋;;刑法视野下的器官移植[J];现代法学;2008年06期
10 孙杨;方鹏骞;;我国器官移植立法现状初步分析[J];医学与社会;2007年08期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 李红涛;人体器官移植相关法律问题研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
2 刘晓惠;我国器官移植中供体的法律保护[D];安徽大学;2005年
3 王洋;器官买卖所涉及刑法问题研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
4 童铁东;器官移植危害行为的刑法规制[D];中南大学;2008年
5 方玉;人体器官移植危害行为的刑法规制[D];中国政法大学;2010年
，本文编号：2314237
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2314237.html
