新加坡鞭刑的历史、成因及启示

发布时间：2018-11-24 11:49

【摘要】：新加坡鞭刑极富特色，同时其争议也颇多。通过对新加坡鞭刑历史沿革的介绍和争议的梳理，可发现，新加坡鞭刑有其自身的发展脉络，政府对于关于鞭刑引发的争议有其自身的看法和回应，对于新加坡鞭刑并不能一味的批判和否定，可以说其介于文明与野蛮之间，至少在新加坡这一制度是适合的。尽管新加坡鞭刑存在诸多争议，可它却长期存在，这一现象是多种因素共同造成的。第一，社会治安压力大。由于多元的社会、匮乏的自然资源等情况，这迫使新加坡保留了鞭刑制度；第二，威权政治体制的存在。新加坡鞭刑是威权政治体制制度层面的具体体现，威权体制下，实用主义的执政理念、强势政府的制度保障，社会本位的价值取向似的政府选择长期实行鞭刑；第三，鞭刑自身特性。新加坡鞭刑所具有的执行成本低、收效明显、相对的刑罚轻微性、耻辱心理的持续性等特性，使得它在惩治犯罪中受到明显的效果。新加坡鞭刑制度的长期存在给我们带来了诸多的启示。一是法治现代化中应重视本土资源并理性对待外来资源，二是刑罚演变是方向性与多样性的统一，三是认识到法律与政治因素的复杂关系。可见，一方面鞭刑制度是新加坡本土文化、政治等资源与外来法制资源相结合的产物，这也是其在新加坡取得了巨大的成功根本原因，他国不宜盲目模仿；另一方面，鞭刑制度作为一种刑罚制度，，其发展并不能超出刑罚演变的现代化方向，只是其途径和时间将取决于新加坡自身的经济、政治、文化因素，就目前来看，鞭刑制度将依然会继续存在。
[Abstract]:Singapore whipping is characteristic, at the same time its controversy is also quite many. By introducing the history of whipping in Singapore and combing the controversy, we can find that the whipping in Singapore has its own development, and the government has its own views and responses to the controversy caused by whipping. To Singapore whipping can not be blindly criticized and denied, it can be said to be between civilization and barbarism, at least in Singapore this system is appropriate. Although there are many controversies about whipping in Singapore, it exists for a long time, which is caused by many factors. First, public order is under great pressure. Due to the plural society and the scarcity of natural resources, Singapore has retained the whipping system; second, the existence of authoritarian political system. The flogging of Singapore is the embodiment of the system of authoritarian political system. Under the authoritarian system, the ruling idea of pragmatism, the system guarantee of strong government, and the value orientation of society standard, the government chooses to implement whipping for a long time. Third, the nature of whipping itself. Singapore's whipping has the characteristics of low execution cost, obvious effect, relatively slight penalty, persistent stigma and so on, which makes it get obvious effect in punishing crime. The long-term existence of the whipping system in Singapore has brought us a lot of enlightenment. First, the modernization of the rule of law should attach importance to local resources and treat foreign resources rationally, second, the evolution of punishment is the unity of direction and diversity, and the third is the recognition of the complex relationship between law and political factors. It can be seen that, on the one hand, the whipping system is the product of the combination of Singapore's native culture, politics and foreign legal resources, which is the fundamental reason for its great success in Singapore, and other countries should not blindly imitate. On the other hand, as a penalty system, the development of the whipping system is not beyond the modernized direction of the evolution of the penalty, but its way and time will depend on Singapore's own economic, political and cultural factors. At present, The system of whipping will continue to exist.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D933.9;D909.9

【参考文献】