正确认识中国特色社会主义法律理想图景——兼评《中国法学向何处去》
发布时间：2018-11-26 14:34
【摘要】：邓正来先生关于中国法学研究的四种模式受制于"西方现代化范式"的影响,必然会导致缺失自己的法律理想图景的观点值得质疑。这四种模式都是学者们为建设中国法治而作的理论努力,它们在学习、借鉴西方优良法律文化的同时,始终将思考并勾勒中国特色社会主义法律理想图景作为研究的出发点和落脚点。改革开放30多年来民主与法制的发展历史表明,中国从来就没有缺失过自己的"法律理想图景",始终在推动中国特色"社会主义法治理念"这一图景的实现和完善,这同时也是中国法学的去向。
[Abstract]:Mr. Deng Zhenglai's view that the four models of Chinese legal studies are bound by the influence of "western modernization paradigm" will inevitably lead to the absence of his own ideal picture of law. These four models are all theoretical efforts made by scholars to build the rule of law in China. They learn from the fine western legal culture at the same time. The starting point and foothold of the study will always be thinking and drawing the legal ideal picture of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The development history of democracy and legal system in the past 30 years of reform and opening up shows that China has never lost its own "ideal picture of law", and has always been promoting the realization and perfection of the vision of "socialist concept of rule of law" with Chinese characteristics. This is also the destination of Chinese law.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D920.0
[Abstract]:Mr. Deng Zhenglai's view that the four models of Chinese legal studies are bound by the influence of "western modernization paradigm" will inevitably lead to the absence of his own ideal picture of law. These four models are all theoretical efforts made by scholars to build the rule of law in China. They learn from the fine western legal culture at the same time. The starting point and foothold of the study will always be thinking and drawing the legal ideal picture of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The development history of democracy and legal system in the past 30 years of reform and opening up shows that China has never lost its own "ideal picture of law", and has always been promoting the realization and perfection of the vision of "socialist concept of rule of law" with Chinese characteristics. This is also the destination of Chinese law.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D920.0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 张文显;;“权利本位”之语义和意义分析——兼论社会主义法是新型的权利本位法[J];中国法学;1990年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张蓉;试析民事法律行为制度与意思自治的关系[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2005年01期
2 董学立;;方法整合与本体确立——关于民法基本原则的初步研究[J];比较法研究;2007年04期
3 陈亚东,田s，
本文编号：2358828
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2358828.html
