美国专利侵权损害赔偿额的确定以及对我国的借鉴
发布时间：2018-11-27 20:24
【摘要】：从2000年我国专利法修改以来，第一次对专利侵权的“损害赔偿”作出较详细的分类规定，结合2008年的第三次修改，我国赔偿金额计算方法有四种：专利权人实际损失、侵权人获利、专利许可费倍数和法定赔偿。专利法第三次修改以后，将专利权人实际损失的计算方式放在了首位，明确了各种计算方法的顺序，但实践操作中仍存在许多无法确定适用规则以及具体运用计算方法上的无力，近几年也有许多学者对该议题提出见解与建议，本人旨在通过对最新书籍和文献数据的解读分析，系统地梳理美国专利侵权赔偿额的确定方法，，尤其是权利人所失利润与合理许可费的实际操作规则，通过一些典型案例的罗列，来找到美国法院确定损害赔偿额的方式，从而找到建立我国相关规则的适用方法。 本文除引言与结语外共由四章组成。 第一章为问题的提出。本章开门见山，由几个典型案例的判决内容与结果引出我国现行专利侵权损害赔偿制度存在的几个问题，主要包括计算方式适用不够完善、举证问题不够清晰以及对侵权人的惩罚力度不够等，这一章的内容为之后的美国相关赔偿制度的展开作了铺垫。 第二章为美国专利侵权损害赔偿额的确定。本章详细介绍了美国的专利救济制度及其损害赔偿的计算方法，包括了非法获利计算方法的历史与废除原因，在一定程度上提供了一些确定赔偿额的线索，重点在于美国法中的所示利润赔偿法与合理许可费赔偿法的介绍，并在其中引出对我国具有影响和借鉴力的要点。 第三章为我国专利侵权损害赔偿额的确定。本章运用实证研究的方法对我国的东部、西部、中部地区的典型省份进行案例追踪，了解每一个专利侵权案件的损害赔偿计算方法以及赔偿额，得出具有研究价值的数据及图表，用以直观地表现我国法院近5年的损害赔偿判决情况，为上文所述我国司法实践中关于使用赔偿额计算方法问题的佐证。 第四章为我国对美国专利侵权损害赔偿制度的借鉴。本章在前两章的基础上，将美国法中较有价值有实践经验的法则引入我国的审判实践中，丰富了法条的概述性，也能为法院在确定损害赔偿额过程提供建设性的完善建议，以期提高我国对专利的保护水平。
[Abstract]:Since the revision of China's Patent Law in 2000, for the first time, the "damages" for patent infringement have been classified in more detail. Combined with the third revision in 2008, there are four methods for calculating the amount of compensation in China: the actual loss of the patentee. Infringer profit, patent license fee multiple and legal compensation. After the third revision of the Patent Law, the calculation method of the actual loss of the patentee has been put in the first place, and the order of various calculation methods has been clarified. However, in practice, there are still many difficulties in determining the applicable rules and the weakness in the concrete application of calculation methods. In recent years, many scholars have also put forward their opinions and suggestions on this subject. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the latest books and literature data. Systematically combing the methods of determining the amount of compensation for patent infringement in the United States, especially the actual operating rules of the lost profits and reasonable licence fees of the right holders, and by listing some typical cases, to find out the way for the US courts to determine the compensation for damages. In order to find out the applicable method of establishing the relevant rules of our country. This paper consists of four chapters except introduction and conclusion. The first chapter is the question. From the content and results of several typical cases, this chapter leads to several problems existing in the current patent infringement compensation system in China, including the inadequate application of calculation methods. The problem of proof is not clear enough and the punishment of infringer is not enough. The content of this chapter paves the way for the development of the related compensation system in the United States. The second chapter is the determination of the damages for patent infringement in the United States. This chapter introduces in detail the patent relief system in the United States and the calculation methods of damages, including the history and the reasons for abolishing the method of illegal profit calculation, and to a certain extent provides some clues to determine the amount of compensation. The emphasis is on the introduction of the profit compensation law and the reasonable license compensation law in American law, and the key points which have influence and reference power to our country. The third chapter is the determination of the damages for patent infringement in China. This chapter uses the method of empirical research to trace the typical provinces in the east, west and central of our country to find out how to calculate the damages and the amount of compensation in each patent infringement case. The data and charts with research value are obtained, which can be used to intuitively express the judgment of damages awarded by Chinese courts in the past five years, which is the proof of the use of compensation calculation method in the judicial practice of our country mentioned above. The fourth chapter is the reference of our country to the American patent infringement compensation system. On the basis of the first two chapters, this chapter introduces the more valuable and practical rules of American law into the trial practice of our country, which enriches the generality of the articles of law, and can also provide constructive suggestions for the court in the process of determining the compensation for damages. In order to improve the level of patent protection in China.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D971.2;D923.42
本文编号：2361938
[Abstract]:Since the revision of China's Patent Law in 2000, for the first time, the "damages" for patent infringement have been classified in more detail. Combined with the third revision in 2008, there are four methods for calculating the amount of compensation in China: the actual loss of the patentee. Infringer profit, patent license fee multiple and legal compensation. After the third revision of the Patent Law, the calculation method of the actual loss of the patentee has been put in the first place, and the order of various calculation methods has been clarified. However, in practice, there are still many difficulties in determining the applicable rules and the weakness in the concrete application of calculation methods. In recent years, many scholars have also put forward their opinions and suggestions on this subject. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the latest books and literature data. Systematically combing the methods of determining the amount of compensation for patent infringement in the United States, especially the actual operating rules of the lost profits and reasonable licence fees of the right holders, and by listing some typical cases, to find out the way for the US courts to determine the compensation for damages. In order to find out the applicable method of establishing the relevant rules of our country. This paper consists of four chapters except introduction and conclusion. The first chapter is the question. From the content and results of several typical cases, this chapter leads to several problems existing in the current patent infringement compensation system in China, including the inadequate application of calculation methods. The problem of proof is not clear enough and the punishment of infringer is not enough. The content of this chapter paves the way for the development of the related compensation system in the United States. The second chapter is the determination of the damages for patent infringement in the United States. This chapter introduces in detail the patent relief system in the United States and the calculation methods of damages, including the history and the reasons for abolishing the method of illegal profit calculation, and to a certain extent provides some clues to determine the amount of compensation. The emphasis is on the introduction of the profit compensation law and the reasonable license compensation law in American law, and the key points which have influence and reference power to our country. The third chapter is the determination of the damages for patent infringement in China. This chapter uses the method of empirical research to trace the typical provinces in the east, west and central of our country to find out how to calculate the damages and the amount of compensation in each patent infringement case. The data and charts with research value are obtained, which can be used to intuitively express the judgment of damages awarded by Chinese courts in the past five years, which is the proof of the use of compensation calculation method in the judicial practice of our country mentioned above. The fourth chapter is the reference of our country to the American patent infringement compensation system. On the basis of the first two chapters, this chapter introduces the more valuable and practical rules of American law into the trial practice of our country, which enriches the generality of the articles of law, and can also provide constructive suggestions for the court in the process of determining the compensation for damages. In order to improve the level of patent protection in China.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D971.2;D923.42
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前8条
1 王利明;美国惩罚性赔偿制度研究[J];比较法研究;2003年05期
2 范晓宇;;专利侵权损害赔偿的要件及其举证责任——以《侵权责任法》为切入点[J];法学杂志;2012年01期
3 张玲;纪璐;;美国专利侵权惩罚性赔偿制度及其启示[J];法学杂志;2013年02期
4 阮开欣;;解读美国专利侵权损害赔偿计算中的合理许可费方法[J];中国发明与专利;2012年07期
5 张玲;;论专利侵权赔偿损失的归责原则[J];中国法学;2012年02期
6 郑成思;侵害知识产权的无过错责任[J];中国法学;1998年01期
7 和育东;;专利侵权损害赔偿计算制度:变迁、比较与借鉴[J];知识产权;2009年05期
8 李秀娟;;评美国Uniloc USA案中重要规则法适用的转变[J];知识产权;2011年05期
本文编号：2361938
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2361938.html
