俄罗斯刑事案件审判前程序中的司法监督研究
发布时间：2018-12-09 20:47
【摘要】：在我国的刑事诉讼程序中,基本上是不允许法官参与审判之前的诉讼活动的,整个刑事诉讼程序是由警察、检察官和法官以“流水线作业”的形式来完成的。这样的模式使得法官无法参与审判前阶段,从而缺少了在这个阶段法官对侦查人员的监督。 在俄罗斯的刑事诉讼程序中却存在这样的制度,即允许法官参与刑事案件的审判前程序,而其参与的目的主要就是行使监督权。本文拟对俄罗斯联邦刑事案件审判前程序中的司法监督制度展开研究,在反思我国现行制度的基础之上,提出一些完善我国刑事诉讼程序监督制度的建议。全文分三部分： 第一部分是对俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼审判前程序中的司法监督制度的一个概述。在这一个部分中,主要是对俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼审判前程序中的司法监督的概念、职能、目的等问题作简要介绍,并且将其与相关的检察监督以及侦查机关内部监督等制度进行了比较。通过该部分的介绍,使得我们对俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼审判前程序中的司法监督制度有一个初步的了解。 第二部分主要介绍了俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼审判前程序中的司法监督制度的实施过程。这一部分内容主要是结合俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法典以及其它相关法律法规的规定,对俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼审判前程序中的司法监督制度的实施过程进行详细的阐述,不仅包括申请、受理、期限等具体的程序,还包括律师参与该程序的一些具体的规定。 第三部分在检讨我国现行的刑事诉讼程序的基础之上,提出了完善我国刑事诉讼程序的一些建议。该部分首先反思了我国现行的刑事诉讼制度中,尤其是在监督这一环节上存在的问题,进而在反思的基础之上,针对监督制度中的问题,结合前文讨论的俄罗斯联邦的相关监督制度,提出了一些我国建立刑事诉讼审判前程序中司法监督制度的构想。 当然,本文的论述只是提供了一些制度构建方面的建议,比较宏观,还需要各个环节的具体措施的制定。而这也恰恰是对这一问题展开更进一步研究的动因之所在。
[Abstract]:In the criminal procedure of our country, judges are basically not allowed to participate in the proceedings before the trial, and the whole criminal procedure is completed by the police, prosecutors and judges in the form of "pipeline operation". This model makes it impossible for judges to participate in the pre-trial stage, thus lacking the judge's supervision of the investigators. In Russian criminal procedure, however, there is such a system that judges are allowed to participate in the pretrial procedure of criminal cases, and the purpose of their participation is mainly to exercise supervisory power. This paper intends to study the judicial supervision system in the pre-trial procedure of criminal cases in the Russian Federation. On the basis of reflecting on the current system in our country, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the supervision system of criminal procedure in our country. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part is an overview of the judicial supervision system in the pretrial procedure of criminal proceedings in the Russian Federation. In this part, the concept, function and purpose of judicial supervision in pre-trial proceedings in criminal proceedings in the Russian Federation are introduced briefly. It is compared with relative procuratorial supervision and internal supervision of investigation organs. Through the introduction of this part, we have a preliminary understanding of the judicial supervision system in the pretrial procedure of criminal proceedings in the Russian Federation. The second part mainly introduces the implementation process of judicial supervision system in the pre-trial procedure of criminal procedure in the Russian Federation. This part mainly describes the implementation process of the judicial supervision system in the pretrial procedure of criminal proceedings in the Russian Federation in combination with the provisions of the Russian Federation Criminal procedure Code and other relevant laws and regulations. Not only the application, acceptance, deadline and other specific procedures, but also the lawyer's participation in the process specific provisions. On the basis of reviewing the current criminal procedure in China, the third part puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the criminal procedure in our country. This part first reflects on the existing problems in the current criminal procedure system of our country, especially on the supervision, and then, on the basis of reflection, aims at the problems in the supervision system. Combined with the relevant supervision system of the Russian Federation discussed above, this paper puts forward some ideas of establishing the judicial supervision system in the pretrial procedure of criminal proceedings in China. Of course, the discussion of this paper only provides some suggestions on the construction of the system, more macro, but also needs the formulation of specific measures of each link. This is precisely the motivation for further research on this issue.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D951.2;DD915.3
本文编号：2370007
[Abstract]:In the criminal procedure of our country, judges are basically not allowed to participate in the proceedings before the trial, and the whole criminal procedure is completed by the police, prosecutors and judges in the form of "pipeline operation". This model makes it impossible for judges to participate in the pre-trial stage, thus lacking the judge's supervision of the investigators. In Russian criminal procedure, however, there is such a system that judges are allowed to participate in the pretrial procedure of criminal cases, and the purpose of their participation is mainly to exercise supervisory power. This paper intends to study the judicial supervision system in the pre-trial procedure of criminal cases in the Russian Federation. On the basis of reflecting on the current system in our country, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the supervision system of criminal procedure in our country. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part is an overview of the judicial supervision system in the pretrial procedure of criminal proceedings in the Russian Federation. In this part, the concept, function and purpose of judicial supervision in pre-trial proceedings in criminal proceedings in the Russian Federation are introduced briefly. It is compared with relative procuratorial supervision and internal supervision of investigation organs. Through the introduction of this part, we have a preliminary understanding of the judicial supervision system in the pretrial procedure of criminal proceedings in the Russian Federation. The second part mainly introduces the implementation process of judicial supervision system in the pre-trial procedure of criminal procedure in the Russian Federation. This part mainly describes the implementation process of the judicial supervision system in the pretrial procedure of criminal proceedings in the Russian Federation in combination with the provisions of the Russian Federation Criminal procedure Code and other relevant laws and regulations. Not only the application, acceptance, deadline and other specific procedures, but also the lawyer's participation in the process specific provisions. On the basis of reviewing the current criminal procedure in China, the third part puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the criminal procedure in our country. This part first reflects on the existing problems in the current criminal procedure system of our country, especially on the supervision, and then, on the basis of reflection, aims at the problems in the supervision system. Combined with the relevant supervision system of the Russian Federation discussed above, this paper puts forward some ideas of establishing the judicial supervision system in the pretrial procedure of criminal proceedings in China. Of course, the discussion of this paper only provides some suggestions on the construction of the system, more macro, but also needs the formulation of specific measures of each link. This is precisely the motivation for further research on this issue.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D951.2;DD915.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 陈瑞华;从“流水作业”走向“以裁判为中心”——对中国刑事司法改革的一种思考[J];法学;2000年03期
，本文编号：2370007
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2370007.html
