外国船员工资索赔:诉讼和仲裁之间的选择——评美国联邦第九巡回法庭the“Rogers v.Royal Caribbean

发布时间：2019-01-17 18:35

【摘要】：简要介绍美国联邦上诉法院第九巡回法庭the"Rogers v.Royal Caribbean Cruise Line"案的案情,回顾美国国会对船员在法院诉讼追偿工资的法定保护和支持执行《纽约公约》下仲裁的两个政策的历史背景以及法庭判案所遵循的先例,按照对案件争议点的审理思路,逐一分析法庭对船员雇佣合同中仲裁协议是否被美国《联邦仲裁法》排除条款排除、《公约法案》和《联邦仲裁法》发生冲突时的优先适用、仲裁协议是否合理以及仲裁条款是否符合公共利益的推理过程,论证法院判决的合理性,提出与判决相反的可能性解释,从而得出结论:出于权衡国会相互冲突的政策的目的,法院判决强制执行仲裁。最后,提出该案例对中国船员立法的借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:Brief introduction to the "Rogers v.Royal Caribbean Cruise Line" case of the Ninth Circuit Court of the United States Federal Court of Appeals, Recalling the historical background of the two policies of the United States Congress to protect crew members in court proceedings for recovery of wages and to support the implementation of the two policies of arbitration under the New York Convention, as well as the precedents followed by the courts in adjudicating cases, in accordance with the thinking of hearing points of dispute in cases, Whether the arbitration agreement in the employment contract of crew members is excluded by the exclusion clause of the Federal Arbitration Act of the United States, and the priority application in the event of conflict between the Convention Act and the Federal Arbitration Act, The process of reasoning whether the arbitration agreement is reasonable and whether the arbitration clause is in the public interest, demonstrates the reasonableness of the court's decision, offers an interpretation of the opposite possibility, and concludes that for the purpose of weighing the conflicting policies of Congress, The court decided to enforce arbitration. Finally, the paper puts forward the reference significance of this case to Chinese crew legislation.
【作者单位】：杜兰大学法学院;Watson
【分类号】：D971.2;DD915

【相似文献】