法律行为的类型化新探——以模式化和类推化为面向

发布时间：2019-01-27 08:27

【摘要】：法律行为的类型化,绝非只应局限于对单一法律行为的分门别类。分门别类本身不是目的,法律行为的分类只是其类型化的第一步;第二步是法律行为的模型化——即归纳、抽象和提炼出特定类型的法律行为的行为模式,而法律行为的模型化之内在之理源自于法律行为的法定性,法律规范的内在结构尤其是行为模式决定着一般社会之行为人的行为何以成为法律行为;第三步是法律行为模式的类推化——类型化的终点就是类推,类型化的思维就是类推思维。司法过程中必须以规定的条件严格衡量那些被抽象概念所规范的对象。凡是诞生于类型化思维的法律规定,必须强调适用过程中反复将法律与个案对应,权衡和区别个案中符合法律规定的特征和没有被法律所描述的特征,进而找到适合个案裁判的细则或理据。
[Abstract]:The classification of legal acts should not be limited to the classification of single legal acts. Categorization is not an end in itself, and the classification of legal acts is only the first step of its classification. The second step is to model the legal act-that is, to induce, abstract and abstract the behavior pattern of the specific type of legal act, and the principle of the modeling of the legal act originates from the legal nature of the legal act. The internal structure of legal norms, especially the behavior pattern, determines how the behavior of the actors in the general society becomes a legal act; The third step is the analogization of legal behavior mode-the end point of typology is analogies, and the typed thinking is analogizing thinking. In the judicial process, those who are regulated by abstract concepts must be strictly measured under prescribed conditions. Where legal provisions are born out of stereotyped thinking, it must be emphasized that in the course of application the law is repeatedly matched with the case, weighing and distinguishing between the characteristics of the case that conform to the law and those that are not described by the law. Then find out the appropriate case judgment details or justifications.
【作者单位】：广西财经学院法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金西部项目《法律行为理论的法哲学进路》(批准号09XFX001)
【分类号】：D90

【共引文献】