论多数决的限制适用
发布时间：2019-01-27 23:12
【摘要】：多数决伴随着民主制度的产生和发展，但是人们在社会发展的过程中往往误以为多数决就是民主的本质，其实不然。民主应该是能够提供人们最基本权利和尊严的一种价值、程序、规范或是权力结构。在民主制度中对多数决的限制具有一定的理论基础——不仅能够适当地防止多数人的暴政，还能使得民主制度朝更完善的方向发展，同时对多数决的限制适用也是权利保留和个人自治等方面的要求。我们应当在人的基本权利、个人独特性、道德、公共舆论等方面对多数决的适用进行限制。在这些方面，我们可以采用协商、辩论，抽签，或者个人决、一致决等方式作为多数决规则的补充。同时我们应当建立司法审查、结社权、少数否决权、复决权等制度，以保障多数决的限制适用，防止多数决的过度适用带来的弊端。
[Abstract]:Majority decision is accompanied by the emergence and development of democratic system, but people often mistake majority decision as the essence of democracy in the process of social development, but it is not. Democracy should be a value, procedure, norm, or structure of power that can provide the most basic rights and dignity of people. The restrictions on majority decisions in a democratic system have a theoretical basis not only to prevent tyranny of the majority, but also to make it more perfect. At the same time, the limitation of majority decision is also the requirement of right reservation and personal autonomy. We should limit the application of majority decision in basic human rights, individual uniqueness, morality, public opinion, etc. In these areas, we can use consultation, debate, drawing lots, or individual decisions, unanimous decisions as a complement to the majority rule. At the same time, we should establish the system of judicial review, the right of association, the minority veto power, the right of referendum and so on, so as to guarantee the application of the limitation of majority decision and prevent the malpractice brought by excessive application of majority decision.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D90-052
本文编号：2416792
[Abstract]:Majority decision is accompanied by the emergence and development of democratic system, but people often mistake majority decision as the essence of democracy in the process of social development, but it is not. Democracy should be a value, procedure, norm, or structure of power that can provide the most basic rights and dignity of people. The restrictions on majority decisions in a democratic system have a theoretical basis not only to prevent tyranny of the majority, but also to make it more perfect. At the same time, the limitation of majority decision is also the requirement of right reservation and personal autonomy. We should limit the application of majority decision in basic human rights, individual uniqueness, morality, public opinion, etc. In these areas, we can use consultation, debate, drawing lots, or individual decisions, unanimous decisions as a complement to the majority rule. At the same time, we should establish the system of judicial review, the right of association, the minority veto power, the right of referendum and so on, so as to guarantee the application of the limitation of majority decision and prevent the malpractice brought by excessive application of majority decision.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D90-052
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 郑玉敏;;民主的合宪性——德沃金的宪政思想研究[J];河北法学;2007年10期
2 周永坤;;违宪审查的民主正当性问题[J];法制与社会发展;2007年04期
3 华燕;;论社会多数决的适用——基于公寓大厦管理立法展开[J];法制与社会发展;2012年03期
，本文编号：2416792
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2416792.html
