“郭玉林等四人抢劫案”的案例分析

发布时间：2019-02-12 07:14

【摘要】： 在大量的财产性犯罪案件中,共同犯罪是比较常见的情形。通常发生的盗窃、抢劫、诈骗等案件往往是有组织,有预谋,多次实施的团体性犯罪。涉及行为人人数众多,犯罪情节复杂,适用法律需要大量的司法解释与理论指导,是刑法研究中很重要的一个部分。本文通过一个具体的抢劫案例来进行阐述,先分析案件的审理过程与判决依据,再着力论述本案最大的争议焦点,即共同犯罪的范围所在。但笔者不完全赞同原判决所定罪名。笔者认为这一案例情节复杂,不应该只单一的定为抢劫罪一罪进行处罚。当抢劫致人死亡的行为与抢劫罪中的手段行为和强取财物行为没有太多关系时,犯罪人致人死亡的行为不可以再理解为是抢劫罪中的“抢劫致人死亡”这一结果加重情形,而构成了其他犯罪,应与抢劫罪实行数罪并罚。本文主要分成五个部分来写：第一部分主要是对“郭玉林等四人抢劫案”的基本案情进行介绍,并说明案件审理过程中的争议焦点及裁判结果。为下文的理论探讨做好前提工作。第二部分是本文的第一个重点问题,从判决依据引出共同正犯的基本理论,深入分析了共同正犯的概念、性质、成立条件以及处理原则。然后再以此来分析整个案件的审理结果。第三部分是本文的第二个重点问题,根据上面的理论分析来深入探讨案例中四个共同正犯者各自的行为性质及应承担的法律责任。由此引出共犯过剩的情形下应该如何判定各共犯者的罪责问题。第四部分主要是对案件审理结果的一个分歧意见,由案件原来的审理结果引出作者自己的一些看法观点,以及对整个案件分析的一个完整补充。最后一个部分是对案件的一个总结,还提出了作者关于刑法理论及司法实践的一些不成熟的思考。
[Abstract]:In a large number of property crimes, joint crime is a relatively common situation. The usual cases of theft, robbery, fraud and so on are organized, premeditated, repeatedly committed group crimes. It is a very important part in the study of criminal law that involving a large number of perpetrators and complex crime circumstances. The application of law requires a large number of judicial interpretation and theoretical guidance. This article through a specific case of robbery to elaborate, first analysis of the trial process of the case and the basis of the judgment, and then focus on the biggest dispute in this case, that is, the scope of joint crime. However, I do not fully agree with the original verdict of the charges. The author believes that this case is complicated and should not be punished as a single crime of robbery. When the death caused by robbery is not much related to the act of means and the act of forcibly taking property in the crime of robbery, the act of death caused by the criminal can no longer be understood as an aggravating circumstance of the result of "robbery causing death" in the crime of robbery. Other crimes should be punished in conjunction with robbery. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part mainly introduces the basic facts of the robbery of Guo Yulin and others, and explains the focus of dispute and the result of judgment in the course of the case trial. For the theoretical discussion below to do a good job of the premise. The second part is the first key problem of this paper. The basic theory of joint principal offender is derived from the judgment basis, and the concept, nature, establishment condition and treatment principle of joint principal offender are analyzed in depth. And then to analyze the outcome of the entire case. The third part is the second key problem of this paper, according to the above theoretical analysis to explore the behavior of the four common principal offenders in the case and their respective legal liability. This leads to the problem of how to judge the guilt of each accomplice in the case of excess accomplice. The fourth part is a different opinion on the trial result of the case, which leads to some views of the author and a complete supplement to the analysis of the whole case. The last part is a summary of the case, and puts forward some immature thinking about the theory of criminal law and judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D920.5

【参考文献】