《法律的概念》与法律的规范性问题研究

发布时间：2019-03-07 12:39

【摘要】： 法律是一种规范性的社会实践,如何理解和解释法律的规范性特征,是法哲学家必须重视的问题。本文以英国著名法哲学家H.L.A.哈特的名著《法律的概念》为依据,阐述了哈特关于法律规范性的理论观点。哈特从批判约翰·奥斯丁的法律命令理论着手,在提出自身关于法概念的理论主张的同时,对于奥斯丁理论忽视法律规范性的理论缺陷给予了猛烈的批判,并通过社会规则、内在观点、承认规则等一系列概念工具,阐述了其以社会规则理论来说明法律规范性的理论主张。本文在分析哈特这一主张的合理性基础之上,通过审视哈特重要的理论对手—德沃金的相关批评,以及哈特之后法律实证主义的重要理论家科尔曼的对哈特理论的若干改进和发展,得出了文章的总体结论,那就是:法律规范性的来源问题是法律规范性理论的重点和难点,法律规范性的来源是否能脱离道德价值得以证立,是各方的分歧所在。
[Abstract]:Law is a normative social practice. How to understand and explain the normative characteristics of law is a problem that legal philosophers must pay attention to. This paper is based on H.L.A., a famous British philosopher of law. Based on Hart's famous book the concept of Law, this paper expounds Hart's theoretical point of view on the standardization of law. Starting from criticizing John Austen's theory of legal order, Hart, while putting forward his own theoretical opinion on the concept of law, gave fierce criticism to the theoretical defect that Austin's theory ignored the legal norm, and passed the social rules. A series of conceptual tools, such as internal viewpoint, recognition rule and so on, are expounded to illustrate the theory of legal norm with the theory of social rules. On the basis of analyzing the rationality of Hart's proposition, this paper examines the relevant criticism of Hart's important theoretical opponent, Dvorkin. As well as the improvement and development of Hart's theory by Coleman, an important theorist of legal positivism after Hart, the general conclusion of the article is that: the source of legal norm is the focus and difficulty of legal normative theory; Whether the source of legal norms can be proved out of moral value is the difference between the parties.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D90

【相似文献】