法律史研究的方向:法学化还是史学化
发布时间：2019-03-27 16:26
【摘要】：中国法律史研究应该走向 "法学化"还是 "史学化",是学界关心的重要问题。法律史学科位于法学学科建制中,长期以来研究主力为法学出身的学者。法学研究者重在对历史进行阐释、惯于演绎逻辑,常以西方法学概念、理论为前提,对中国法律进行评判,因此目前法律史研究出现的主要问题是史料基础薄弱、西方中心主义与现代化范式泛滥。近些年大量史学出身的研究者进入法律史领域,为法律史研究带来新气象。基于史学基础薄弱的现状,法律史研究应当走向史学化。在这一前提下,研究者个人应追求法史兼修,学界应加强分工合作。
[Abstract]:Whether the study of Chinese legal history should go to "legalization" or "historical study" is an important issue concerned by the academic circles. The subject of legal history is located in the system of legal discipline. For a long time, the main research force is a scholar of legal origin. Legal researchers focus on the interpretation of history, accustomed to deductive logic, often on the premise of western legal concepts and theories, to judge Chinese law, so the main problem in the study of legal history at present is the weak foundation of historical materials. Western centralism and the spread of the paradigm of modernization. In recent years, a large number of historical researchers entered the field of legal history, bringing a new atmosphere for the study of legal history. Based on the weak basis of historiography, the study of legal history should be historical. Under this premise, the researcher should pursue the history of law and the academic circles should strengthen the cooperation of division of work.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院近代史研究所;
【分类号】：D929
[Abstract]:Whether the study of Chinese legal history should go to "legalization" or "historical study" is an important issue concerned by the academic circles. The subject of legal history is located in the system of legal discipline. For a long time, the main research force is a scholar of legal origin. Legal researchers focus on the interpretation of history, accustomed to deductive logic, often on the premise of western legal concepts and theories, to judge Chinese law, so the main problem in the study of legal history at present is the weak foundation of historical materials. Western centralism and the spread of the paradigm of modernization. In recent years, a large number of historical researchers entered the field of legal history, bringing a new atmosphere for the study of legal history. Based on the weak basis of historiography, the study of legal history should be historical. Under this premise, the researcher should pursue the history of law and the academic circles should strengthen the cooperation of division of work.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院近代史研究所;
【分类号】：D929
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 苏亦工;法律史学研究方法问题商榷[J];北方工业大学学报;1997年04期
2 徐忠明;关于中国法律史研究的几点省思[J];现代法学;2001年01期
3 刘广安;;中国法史学基础问题反思[J];政法论坛;2006年01期
4 李显冬;试论中国古代固有民法的开放性体系[J];杭州师范学院学报(社会科学版);2003年05期
5 梁治平;法律史的墫界:方法、旨趣，
本文编号：2448349
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2448349.html
