残障、昂贵偏好与承认的区分性机制以德沃金的两种平等主义为分析资料

发布时间：2019-04-09 20:25

【摘要】：福利平等主义和资源平等主义是德沃金提出的两种资源分配方式,在其中如何区分残障与昂贵偏好,以及为了初始资源分配的平等,如何给予残障者资源补贴并把昂贵偏好者企图鱼目混珠的要求区别开来,是保证平等分配的一个很具体的问题。福利平等主义因其存在的道德风险和单边主义而提前出局,资源平等主义也在误解中犯错:拍卖所要追求的结果其实是福利经济学第二基本原理所提及的可能结果;由保险以观望者的角色去评价人们的第二层次的欲望,即由个人从超越文化背景预设的基础上去评估他们的偏好,是无法完成的任务。是承认理论,从立足于视野融合的风险验证角度入手,利用本质实践—非本质实践的新范式对昂贵偏好者的资质和要求本身进行分析,从而为实践资源平等主义提供了支持。
[Abstract]:Welfare egalitarianism and resource egalitarianism are two methods of resource allocation proposed by Dvorkin, in which how to distinguish between disability and expensive preference, and in order to achieve equality in the initial allocation of resources, How to subsidize the resources of the disabled and distinguish the requirement of the expensive ones trying to mix fish and beads is a very specific problem to ensure the equal distribution. Welfare egalitarianism is out ahead of time because of its moral hazard and unilateralism, and resource egalitarianism makes mistakes in misunderstanding: the result of auction is actually the possible result mentioned in the second basic principle of welfare economics; It is an impossible task for insurance to evaluate people's second-level desires in terms of the role of spectator, that is, to assess their preferences by individuals on the basis of transcending the presupposition of cultural background. It is the recognition theory, starting from the perspective of risk verification based on the fusion of vision, using the new paradigm of essential practice-non-essential practice to analyze the qualifications and requirements of expensive enthusiasts, thus providing support for the practice of resource egalitarianism.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【分类号】：D909.1

【共引文献】