裁判方法论:迷思与超越
发布时间：2019-05-31 22:41
【摘要】：正裁判方法在当下似乎成为统一法律适用与规范裁量权的灵丹妙药。但是,方法并非我们想象的那样总是可靠而且有效。〔1〕特别是在辩证法与形而上学发生了巨大的范式分野之后,坚持什么方法就必须考察其背后的方法论。在裁判方法论的理论版图上,一直存在着独断主
[Abstract]:At present, the method of positive adjudication seems to be a panacea for unifying the application of law and standardizing discretion. However, the method is not always reliable and effective as we think. (1) especially after the huge paradigm distinction between dialectics and metaphysics, it is necessary to examine the methodology behind it. In the theoretical territory of referee methodology, there has always been arbitrariness.
【作者单位】： 最高人民法院;
【分类号】：D90
[Abstract]:At present, the method of positive adjudication seems to be a panacea for unifying the application of law and standardizing discretion. However, the method is not always reliable and effective as we think. (1) especially after the huge paradigm distinction between dialectics and metaphysics, it is necessary to examine the methodology behind it. In the theoretical territory of referee methodology, there has always been arbitrariness.
【作者单位】： 最高人民法院;
【分类号】：D90
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘捷;从本体论到实践论——马克思主义论人的方法的根本变革[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2000年02期
2 马育良;仁、义与孔孟的经权思想[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2000年04期
3 彭启福;西方诠释学诠释重心的转换及其合理走向[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2003年02期
4 张，
本文编号：2490061
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2490061.html
