美国SOPA议案评析及其对我国网络知识产权立法的启示
发布时间：2019-06-15 11:44
【摘要】：在网络环境下,现有知识产权制度已无法适应保护知识产权的需要,各国都在酝酿知识产权制度变革。作为知识产权保护的急先锋,美国推出了SOPA议案,该议案在制止知识产权网络侵权方面采用了很多创新举措,因而受到了权利人的一致欢迎。但SOPA议案采用的创新举措过于激进,会引发株连无辜网站、妨碍言论自由以及危害网络产业发展等不良后果,导致其饱受争议、通过受阻。我国网络知识产权立法应从SOPA议案的折戟中吸收教训,一方面要迎合我国公共政策的需要,另一方面要遵循"比例原则"体现出来的平衡理念。
[Abstract]:In the network environment, the existing intellectual property system has been unable to meet the needs of intellectual property protection, and all countries are brewing the reform of intellectual property system. As a pioneer in intellectual property protection, the United States launched the SOPA bill, which has adopted a number of innovative measures to stop intellectual property network infringement, so it has been unanimously welcomed by rights holders. But the innovative measures adopted in the SOPA bill are too radical, causing innocent websites, hindering freedom of speech and jeopardizing the development of the online industry, causing it to be controversial and blocked. The legislation of network intellectual property rights in China should absorb the lessons from the SOPA motion, on the one hand, it should meet the needs of China's public policy, on the other hand, it should follow the balance concept embodied in the principle of proportion.
【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学知识产权学院;
【分类号】：D923;D971.2
本文编号：2500185
[Abstract]:In the network environment, the existing intellectual property system has been unable to meet the needs of intellectual property protection, and all countries are brewing the reform of intellectual property system. As a pioneer in intellectual property protection, the United States launched the SOPA bill, which has adopted a number of innovative measures to stop intellectual property network infringement, so it has been unanimously welcomed by rights holders. But the innovative measures adopted in the SOPA bill are too radical, causing innocent websites, hindering freedom of speech and jeopardizing the development of the online industry, causing it to be controversial and blocked. The legislation of network intellectual property rights in China should absorb the lessons from the SOPA motion, on the one hand, it should meet the needs of China's public policy, on the other hand, it should follow the balance concept embodied in the principle of proportion.
【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学知识产权学院;
【分类号】：D923;D971.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 吴汉东;;利弊之间:知识产权制度的政策科学分析[J];法商研究;2006年05期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 杨红军;;知识产权制度变迁中契约观念的演进及其启示[J];法商研究;2007年02期
2 刘春田;;知识产权法研究的基础性与多样性发展[J];法学家;2007年01期
3 胡朝阳;;论知识产权制度的社会适应性[J];法学论坛;2007年03期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 黄武双;制度移植与功能回归[D];华东政法学院;2006年
2 孙祥壮;知识产权法治构造的理论逻辑[D];南京师范大学;2007年
3 何炼红;工业版权研究[D];西南政法大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 田胜;知识产权与人权的冲突和协调[D];中南民族大学;2007年
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 吴汉东;后TRIPs时代知识产权制度的变革与中国的应对方略[J];法商研究;2005年05期
，本文编号：2500185
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2500185.html
