由命题出发的概念坐标系——也谈法律史研究方法
发布时间：2019-07-20 19:07
【摘要】：在中国法律史的研究中,单一的考证或社会史方法只能研究古代法外在的"量"与"效",无法深究内在之"质"与"因",而规范分析的方法,虽能够深入研究古代法的内在机理,却存在"以今日之见揣度前人"的潜在风险。为避免这种风险,应建立一个由命题出发的概念坐标系,综合运用考证、社会史、规范分析的方法,以在古今中西不同概念、思想、制度体系之间展开平等的"相互对释"。这需要研究者对所比较的对象有同等深度的认识和学术根底,且在历史观和方法论上有深思熟虑的修养和整体系统的眼光。
[Abstract]:In the study of Chinese legal history, a single textual research or social history method can only study the external "quantity" and "effect" of ancient law, and can not deeply study the internal "quality" and "cause". Although the method of normative analysis can deeply study the internal mechanism of ancient law, there is the potential risk of "speculating on the predecessor from today's point of view". In order to avoid this risk, a conceptual coordinate system based on proposition should be established, and the methods of textual research, social history and normative analysis should be comprehensively used in order to carry out equal "mutual interpretation" between different concepts, ideas and systems between ancient and modern China and the West. This requires researchers to have the same depth of understanding and academic background of the objects compared, and to have a thoughtful cultivation and overall systematic vision in the view of history and methodology.
【作者单位】： 华中科技大学法学院;
【基金】：华中科技大学“教学质量工程”第六批教学研究项目
【分类号】：D909.2
[Abstract]:In the study of Chinese legal history, a single textual research or social history method can only study the external "quantity" and "effect" of ancient law, and can not deeply study the internal "quality" and "cause". Although the method of normative analysis can deeply study the internal mechanism of ancient law, there is the potential risk of "speculating on the predecessor from today's point of view". In order to avoid this risk, a conceptual coordinate system based on proposition should be established, and the methods of textual research, social history and normative analysis should be comprehensively used in order to carry out equal "mutual interpretation" between different concepts, ideas and systems between ancient and modern China and the West. This requires researchers to have the same depth of understanding and academic background of the objects compared, and to have a thoughtful cultivation and overall systematic vision in the view of history and methodology.
【作者单位】： 华中科技大学法学院;
【基金】：华中科技大学“教学质量工程”第六批教学研究项目
【分类号】：D909.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 曾宪义,马小红;中国传统法研究中的几个问题[J];法学研究;2003年03期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蒋铁初;;中国古代民事证据法的特点[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2007年04期
2 胡建淼;杨登峰;;有利法律溯及原则及其适用中的若干问题[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年06期
3 何虹;;完善我国城市房屋拆迁补偿范围的思考[J];北方经济;2006年16期
4 刘育U，
本文编号：2516875
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2516875.html
