论创设性刑法规范解释的不正当性
发布时间：2019-08-12 08:13
【摘要】：基于罪刑法定原则的制约,刑法解释理当最具保守主义倾向。我国刑法规范性解释法律文件异常繁荣的背后,对刑法规范作出实质性变更而已具有创设刑法规范功能的诸多有权解释的盛行,应引起我们的警惕。刑法领域过度解释的现象,已在某种程度上消融刑法规则的刚性边界,使得刑法文本安全性面临挑战。创设性刑法规范解释凭借其权力优势与广泛的影响力,以一种更为隐蔽的方式存活于我国刑事司法中,进而影响到罪刑法定在当代刑事司法中真正的、完全的贯彻。
[Abstract]:Based on the restriction of the principle of legality of crime and punishment, the interpretation of criminal law should be the most conservative. Behind the extraordinary prosperity of the legal documents of the normative interpretation of criminal law in our country, the prevalence of many entitled interpretations which have the function of creating criminal law norms by making substantive changes to criminal law norms should arouse our vigilance. To some extent, the phenomenon of excessive interpretation in the field of criminal law has melted the rigid boundary of criminal law rules, which makes the security of criminal law text face challenges. With its power advantages and extensive influence, the creative criminal law standard interpretation lives in the criminal justice of our country in a more covert way, and then affects the real and complete implementation of the criminal law in the contemporary criminal justice.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学;
【分类号】：D924;D920.0
[Abstract]:Based on the restriction of the principle of legality of crime and punishment, the interpretation of criminal law should be the most conservative. Behind the extraordinary prosperity of the legal documents of the normative interpretation of criminal law in our country, the prevalence of many entitled interpretations which have the function of creating criminal law norms by making substantive changes to criminal law norms should arouse our vigilance. To some extent, the phenomenon of excessive interpretation in the field of criminal law has melted the rigid boundary of criminal law rules, which makes the security of criminal law text face challenges. With its power advantages and extensive influence, the creative criminal law standard interpretation lives in the criminal justice of our country in a more covert way, and then affects the real and complete implementation of the criminal law in the contemporary criminal justice.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学;
【分类号】：D924;D920.0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 艾小乐,王耀忠;论真正的罪名法定化——罪刑法定主义之本义[J];当代法学;2003年06期
2 赵运锋;;刑法解释立场:在形式主义与现实主义之间[J];东方法学;2011年04期
3 赵秉志;陈志军;;论越权刑法解释[J];法学家;2004年02期
4 肖中华;;刑法目的解释和体系解释的具体运用[J];法学评论;2006年05期
5 陈兴良,周光权;刑法司法解释的限度——兼论司法法之存在及其合理性[J];法学;1997年03期
6 董v，
本文编号：2525591
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2525591.html
