论司法判决书中的（非）礼貌现象及其客观性
发布时间：2020-11-01 11:45
本文采用语言学理论对判决书中出现的礼貌现象进行研究。本文提到的礼貌现象并不是平常意义上的礼貌用语，它涉及到礼貌和非礼貌两种情况。面子是人们在互相交往中倍感珍贵的东西。我们在交际中会给面子，留面子或者丢面子。要做到为对方保留面子，使用礼貌策略是一个重要手段。但是在任何交往中，人们并非时刻会考虑到要为对方留面子，特别是在说话人与听话人权利地位不平衡的情况下，对听话人面子的威胁也是一种语言策略，能为说话人更好的达到目的服务。在司法判决书中，这种礼貌现象与非礼貌现象得到了很好的体现。当法官对当事人或下级法院意见持同意态度时，他会使用各种礼貌策略来明确表达他的肯定的态度，这同时也是对当事面子进行维护的一种做法。当法官对当事人或下级法院意见持不同意见时，有时则会因考虑听话人的面子问题而做出含糊的甚至不合理的判决。 本文通过对司法判决书中的礼貌现象的研究，旨在发现主要的礼貌与非礼貌策略及其语言实现形式，提示礼貌策略对法官客观表达其观点起到一定作用。根据Brown Levinson的面子理论和Culpeper关于非礼貌策略的观点，我们在语料中区分了法官所使用的礼貌策略与非礼貌策略。研究表明，在司法判决这种相当正式和具有强制性的文件中，礼貌与非礼貌现象都是大量存在并广泛运用的一种语言现象。 司法判决中的礼貌与非礼貌现象与日常生活中的礼貌现象所发挥的作用不同，法官需要协调人际关系，解决争端，最终达到客观、公正的判决。适当的运用礼貌与非礼貌策略对于法官做出客观的判决起到积极的作用。 希望本文有助于加深对礼貌的了解，使人们认识到礼貌现象对实现客观、合理的审判起到积极作用，有助于法官更好的运用礼貌与非礼貌策略使自己的判决更能让当事人及广大群众心服口服。同时，本研究对法律教学与司法文件翻译都能起到一定的启发作用。
【学位单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位年份】：2006
【中图分类】：D90-055;D916.1
【文章目录】：
DECLARATION
Acknowledgment
Abstract
摘要
List of figures and tables
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Rationale
1.3 Objectives
1.4 Data and methodology
1.5 The organization of the thesis
Chapter 2 Review of Related Literature
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Studies on objectivity in judicial judgments
2.1.1 Studies on objectivity in Chinese judicial judgments
2.2.2 Studies on objectivity in English judgments
2.3 Studies on politeness
2.3.1 Lakoff's politeness rules
2.3.2 Leech's Politeness Principles
2.2.3 Brown and Levinson's Theory of Politeness
2.3 Impoliteness work inspired by B&L's theory
2.4 Studies on politeness in legal context
2.5 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretic framework and procedures
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Definition of key terms
3.2.1 Politeness
3.2.2 Impoliteness
3.2.3 （im）Politeness phenomena
3.3 Theoretical Background of the Present Study
3.3.1 Brown & Levinson's Politeness Theory
3.3.2 Culpeper's impoliteness framework
3.3.3 Objectivity Theory
3.4 Description of a Theoretical Framework
3.5 Procedures
3.5.1 The use of politeness strategies in agreement
3.5.2 The function of the politeness and impoliteness strategies
3.6 Summary
Chapter 4 Politeness and impoliteness strategies in judgments
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Politeness strategies
4.2.1 Positive politeness strategies in agreement
4.2.2 Negative politeness strategies
4.3 Impoliteness strategies
4.3.1 Positive impoliteness strategies
4.3.2 Negative impoliteness strategies
4.4 Speech acts to realize the （im）politeness strategies
4.4.1 The speech acts of politeness strategies
4.4.2 Speech acts of impoliteness
4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 Functionality of （Im）Politeness Phenomena in Judicial Judgments
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Objectivity theories and （im）politeness phenomena
5.3 Objectivity reflected in the politeness strategies
5.4 Objectivity reflected in the impoliteness
5.5 Summary
Chapter 6 Conclusion
6.1 Summary of the present study
6.2 Conclusion
6.3 Implications
6.4 Limitations and suggestions for further research
References
【参考文献】
本文编号：2865485
【学位单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位年份】：2006
【中图分类】：D90-055;D916.1
【文章目录】：
DECLARATION
Acknowledgment
Abstract
摘要
List of figures and tables
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Rationale
1.3 Objectives
1.4 Data and methodology
1.5 The organization of the thesis
Chapter 2 Review of Related Literature
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Studies on objectivity in judicial judgments
2.1.1 Studies on objectivity in Chinese judicial judgments
2.2.2 Studies on objectivity in English judgments
2.3 Studies on politeness
2.3.1 Lakoff's politeness rules
2.3.2 Leech's Politeness Principles
2.2.3 Brown and Levinson's Theory of Politeness
2.3 Impoliteness work inspired by B&L's theory
2.4 Studies on politeness in legal context
2.5 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretic framework and procedures
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Definition of key terms
3.2.1 Politeness
3.2.2 Impoliteness
3.2.3 （im）Politeness phenomena
3.3 Theoretical Background of the Present Study
3.3.1 Brown & Levinson's Politeness Theory
3.3.2 Culpeper's impoliteness framework
3.3.3 Objectivity Theory
3.4 Description of a Theoretical Framework
3.5 Procedures
3.5.1 The use of politeness strategies in agreement
3.5.2 The function of the politeness and impoliteness strategies
3.6 Summary
Chapter 4 Politeness and impoliteness strategies in judgments
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Politeness strategies
4.2.1 Positive politeness strategies in agreement
4.2.2 Negative politeness strategies
4.3 Impoliteness strategies
4.3.1 Positive impoliteness strategies
4.3.2 Negative impoliteness strategies
4.4 Speech acts to realize the （im）politeness strategies
4.4.1 The speech acts of politeness strategies
4.4.2 Speech acts of impoliteness
4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 Functionality of （Im）Politeness Phenomena in Judicial Judgments
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Objectivity theories and （im）politeness phenomena
5.3 Objectivity reflected in the politeness strategies
5.4 Objectivity reflected in the impoliteness
5.5 Summary
Chapter 6 Conclusion
6.1 Summary of the present study
6.2 Conclusion
6.3 Implications
6.4 Limitations and suggestions for further research
References
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 王霞;论审判公开的形式与实质[J];内蒙古社会科学(汉文版);2002年01期
2 杜金榜;从目前的研究看法律语言学学科体系的构建[J];现代外语;2000年01期
3 张新红;汉语立法语篇的言语行为分析[J];现代外语;2000年03期
4 张新红;文本类型与法律文本[J];现代外语;2001年02期
5 陈国利,刘秋平;走出法官独立的困境[J];西南政法大学学报;2004年02期
6 傅郁林;民事裁判文书的功能与风格[J];中国社会科学;2000年04期
本文编号：2865485
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2865485.html
