论排污权基础理论重构及其路径

发布时间：2018-03-03 19:17

本文选题：理论重构　切入点：排污权内涵　出处：《山东大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 在治理污染、保护环境的过程中,传统的“命令——控制型”控制手段由于是政府的单方面行为,缺乏环境治理相对人的参与,在很大程度上限制了其实施的效果,在解决日益复杂的环境问题上,该模式显示出后继乏力的颓势。而排污权交易作为一项环境治理的政策工具,在国外已经得到普遍运用,由于其充分发挥了市场经济的优势,能够有效的控制和减少污染物排放,也受到我国学界的关注。然而,排污权作为确立排污权交易基础,对其内涵和性质的研究,特别是从法学意义上的界定仍显单薄。目前我国学界对排污权名称界定上就存在分歧,对其性质也存在“公权说”、“私权说”、“资格说”等学说。本文回顾和反思了学界对排污权内涵界定的基础,概括和归纳了学界对排污权认识上的共识,以便于排污权进入立法为目的,就排污权的性质予以深入的探讨,认为排污权不是一种单一内容的权利,并非仅是指对环境容量的使用权,而是排污资格与环境容量使用权的双重复合,有别于通说认为的民事权利,也不是纯粹的行政法意义上的排污许可,并通过界定排污权的特征和调整排污许可证取得程序的方法协调了排污交易与行政法之间的矛盾；通过解释的方法,重新梳理了民法上物的概念,使环境容量作为一种“物”、环境容量使用权成为物权,进而将排污权纳入到民法的调整范围,消除了排污权立法的民法障碍。
[Abstract]:In the process of pollution control and environmental protection, the traditional "command-control" control method is a unilateral act of the government and lacks the participation of the relative person in environmental governance, which limits to a great extent the effect of its implementation. In solving the increasingly complex environmental problems, the model shows a declining trend of subsequent weakness. As a policy tool of environmental governance, emissions trading has been widely used abroad, because of its full play of the advantages of the market economy. Can effectively control and reduce pollutant emissions, but also by the academic community in China. However, as the basis for establishing the trading of emission rights, the research on the connotation and nature of emission rights, especially from the legal sense of the definition is still weak. At present, there are differences in the definition of the name of emission rights in Chinese academic circles. There are some theories about its nature, such as public right theory, private right theory and qualification theory. This paper reviews and reflects on the basis of defining the connotation of emission rights in academic circles, summarizes and sums up the consensus on the understanding of emission rights in academic circles, and makes a thorough discussion on the nature of emission rights in order to facilitate the introduction of emission rights into legislation. The author thinks that the pollution discharge right is not a kind of single content right, it is not only the right to use the environmental capacity, but also the dual compound of the pollution discharge qualification and the environmental capacity right, which is different from the civil rights thought by the general theory. Nor is it purely administrative law about emission permits, and the contradiction between emissions trading and administrative law is reconciled by defining the characteristics of emission rights and adjusting the procedures for obtaining emission permits; by means of interpretation, This paper reorganizes the concept of things in civil law, makes the environmental capacity as a kind of "thing", and the right to use environmental capacity becomes the real right, and then brings the pollution discharge right into the adjustment scope of the civil law, and eliminates the obstacles of civil law in the legislation of pollution discharge right.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.68

【参考文献】