中美饮用水安全法律保障问题比较研究
发布时间:2018-03-04 05:18
本文选题:饮用水 切入点:饮用水安全 出处:《湖南师范大学》2008年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】: 饮用水是人类生存的基本需求,饮用水是否安全直接关系到广大人民群众的健康。但是,我国饮用水却存在着“不安全”的态势,不少地区水资源短缺,有的城市饮用水水源污染加重,一些农村地区饮用水存在苦咸或含有高氟、高砷及血吸虫病原体等问题,对人民群众身体健康构成严重威胁。这些严重的安全隐患已成为突出的环境问题及社会问题。 文章以比较法学为视角,研究和比较了中美两国饮用水安全的法律保障问题,以期为更好地解决我国饮用水安全法律保障的理论和实践中存在的问题提供一些借鉴。 文章采取比较分析、实证分析、规范分析和历史分析等方法,以提出问题、分析问题、解决问题为思路,尝试着对中美饮用水安全法律保障问题作一番初浅的探讨。文章首先对饮用水安全法律保障所涉及的相关问题进行初步阐述,明确了饮用水安全的含义,论述了保障饮用水安全的重要性和可行性;接着对中美两国饮用水安全法律保障的法律体系进行了比较研究,通过比较找出了我国饮用水安全法律保障的法律体系结构中存在的立法空白及不足;接下来对中美饮用水安全法律保障的相关内容进行了比较,其中重点比较了管理体制、基本制度、法律责任三个方面,并在此基础上,找出了我国饮用水安全法律保障内容上存在的问题;最后,针对我国相关法律体系及相关内容中存在的问题提出了对我国饮用水安全法律保障相关问题的完善建议。建议在确立饮用水安全法律保障的指导思想和基本原则的前提下,完善我国饮用水安全法律保障的法律体系、管理体制和基本制度。
[Abstract]:Drinking water is the basic requirement of human survival. The safety of drinking water is directly related to the health of the people. However, there is an "unsafe" situation in drinking water in China, and water resources are in short supply in many areas. In some cities, the pollution of drinking water sources has increased. In some rural areas, drinking water has some problems, such as brackish or high fluoride, arsenic and schistosomiasis pathogens. These serious safety risks have become prominent environmental and social problems. From the perspective of comparative jurisprudence, this paper studies and compares the legal protection of drinking water safety between China and the United States in order to provide some references for solving the problems existing in the theory and practice of the legal protection of drinking water safety in China. This paper adopts the methods of comparative analysis, empirical analysis, normative analysis and historical analysis. This paper attempts to make a preliminary discussion on the legal protection of drinking water safety in China and the United States. Firstly, the article makes a preliminary exposition on the relevant issues involved in the legal protection of drinking water safety, and clarifies the meaning of drinking water safety. This paper discusses the importance and feasibility of ensuring the safety of drinking water, and then makes a comparative study on the legal system of the legal protection of drinking water safety between China and the United States. Through the comparison to find out the legislative gaps and deficiencies in the legal system of drinking water safety in our country. Then, compared the relevant contents of the legal protection of drinking water safety between China and the United States, among which the emphasis is on the comparison of the management system. Basic system, legal liability, and on this basis, found out our drinking water safety in the content of legal protection problems; finally, In view of the problems existing in the relevant legal system and related contents of our country, this paper puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the relevant problems in the legal protection of drinking water safety in our country. Under the premise of establishing the guiding ideology and basic principles of the legal protection of drinking water safety, the author suggests that, Improve our drinking water safety legal system, management system and basic system.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2008
【分类号】:D912.6
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 刘晋;我国城市饮用水安全保障法律制度研究[D];江西理工大学;2010年
2 周林岩;我国饮用水安全保障问题研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
3 阎道宏;我国水污染防治法律制度研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
4 董敏;我国饮用水安全法律保障研究[D];山东科技大学;2011年
5 孟建斌;微污染与高污染双水源条件下生物预处理工艺切换原水试验研究[D];华南理工大学;2010年
6 李广荣;我国农村饮用水安全保障法制体系研究[D];中国政法大学;2012年
7 王敏;农村饮用水安全保障的法律研究[D];昆明理工大学;2012年
8 段晓娟;我国饮用水水源地保护制度完善探析[D];昆明理工大学;2012年
,本文编号:1564289
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/1564289.html