我国环境民事纠纷行政处理机制与诉讼机制的关系研究
本文选题:环境纠纷 + 环境民事纠纷 ; 参考:《南昌大学》2010年硕士论文
【摘要】:环境纠纷是随着经济发展和公民环保意识的增强而出现一种现代型纠纷。传统的私权自治理论认为,民事纠纷应当由当事人自由处分,行政权力不得过多干涉。因此,介入私人纠纷一直是行政权所极力回避的事情。但是,环境纠纷是一种关系到广泛区域中不特定多数人利益的社会问题,需要基于专业知识的判断加以解决。因此,在解决环境民事纠纷时,掌握较多社会资源的行政机关的积极协助就显得十分必要。 本文分为引言、正文、结语三个部分。正文分为四章,第一章从环境民事纠纷的基本问题出发,介绍了环境民事纠纷的概念,简述了环境民事纠纷的解决机制的基本问题,并分析了环境民事纠纷行政处理的正当性。 第二章着重介绍了环境民事纠纷解决机制较为发达的国家,在环境民事纠纷行政处理机制和民事诉讼的关系问题上所采用的模式,为我国关系模式的研究奠定基础。 第三章在对我国环境民事纠纷行政处理机制与诉讼机制的关系模式进行阐释的同时,提出了构建我国环境民事纠纷的行政处理机制与现行诉讼机制之间的关系模式中待解决的问题。 第四章在完善我国环境民事纠纷行政处理机制的基础上,提出了环境民事纠纷行政解决机制与诉讼机制的关系的新模式,即程序选择且不可并行、行政裁决有强制力、行政调解经合法审查有效的关系模式,以及此种模式的具体制度构建问题。
[Abstract]:Environmental dispute is a kind of modern dispute with the development of economy and the enhancement of citizen's consciousness of environmental protection. The traditional private right autonomy theory holds that civil disputes should be disposed of freely by the parties, and administrative power should not interfere too much. Therefore, the intervention in private disputes has always been the administrative power to avoid the matter. However, environmental disputes are a kind of social problems related to the interests of non-specific majority in a wide range of regions, which need to be resolved based on the judgment of professional knowledge. Therefore, it is necessary to solve environmental civil disputes with the help of administrative organs with more social resources. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the concept of environmental civil disputes from the basic problems of environmental civil disputes, briefly describes the basic problems of environmental civil disputes resolution mechanism, and analyzes the legitimacy of environmental civil disputes administrative processing. The second chapter focuses on the environmental civil dispute settlement mechanism developed countries in the environmental civil dispute administrative handling mechanism and civil litigation in the relationship between the use of the model for China to lay a foundation for the study of the relationship model. The third chapter explains the relationship between administrative mechanism and litigation mechanism of environmental civil disputes in China, at the same time, The problems to be solved in the relationship between the administrative handling mechanism of environmental civil disputes and the current litigation mechanism in China are put forward. Chapter four, on the basis of perfecting the administrative handling mechanism of environmental civil disputes in our country, puts forward a new model of the relationship between the administrative settlement mechanism of environmental civil disputes and the litigation mechanism, that is, the procedure choice is not parallel, and the administrative adjudication has the force of enforcement. Administrative mediation through legal examination of the effective relationship model, as well as the specific system construction of this model.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D922.6;D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 杨娟;环境纠纷行政性诉讼外纠纷解决方法(ADR)机制的构建[J];北方环境;2003年04期
2 齐树洁;;论我国环境纠纷解决机制之重构[J];法律适用;2006年09期
3 黄锡生,邓禾;韩国的环境纠纷行政解决制度及其借鉴[J];环境保护;2004年03期
4 林全玲;张邦辉;;论环境民事纠纷行政处理机制的完善[J];四川环境;2006年01期
5 蔡守秋;从我国环保部门处理环境民事纠纷的性质谈高效环境纠纷处理机制的建立[J];政法论坛;2003年05期
6 王灿发;论环境纠纷处理与环境损害赔偿专门立法[J];政法论坛;2003年05期
7 张式军;论环境纠纷的行政处理——兼评《环境保护法》第41条及其完善[J];法治论丛;2003年06期
8 朱艳艳,邹雄;行政处理环境侵权民事纠纷法律制度研究[J];行政与法;2005年08期
9 崔凤友,柏杨;环境纠纷的行政处理机制探析[J];学术交流;2004年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 刘红娜;行政机关解决纠纷行为性质研究[D];郑州大学;2004年
2 李宇;环境污染民事纠纷的诉讼外解决机制研究[D];武汉大学;2005年
3 魏玉金;环境纠纷ADR模式研究[D];福州大学;2006年
4 景昊;环境民事纠纷的非诉讼解决机制研究[D];西南政法大学;2007年
5 俞小旬;环境纠纷行政裁决制度研究[D];四川大学;2007年
,本文编号:1877025
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/1877025.html