江苏盐城水污染案件的定性分析及法律完善

发布时间：2018-07-07 15:44

本文选题：重大环境污染事故罪 + 投放危险物质罪　；参考：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文是一篇案例分析型论文。环境关系人类生死存亡。近几年环境污染严重,环境污染事故频发,而环境刑法却滞后于现实,无法有效打击污染环境的犯罪行为从而保护环境。为此,本文由争议较大的江苏盐城水污染案件为案例展开分析研究,提出完善环境刑法的建议。本文先介绍案由和案件基本情况,然后从犯罪构成的四个方面要件出发,对重大环境污染事故罪和投放危险物质罪分别展开分析,并重点讨论了二者的不同之处。在此基础上对本案的被告人行为的法律定性进行了分析,得出了结论。最后本文阐述了重大环境污染事故罪在当前立法中存在的缺陷,由此笔者提出完善此罪的建议。全文总共分为六个部分,提要如下：第一部分是案由：江苏盐城水污染案件。第二部分是案情介绍。简要介绍江苏盐城的水污染案件基本情况。第三部分是案例的争议焦点。关于本案例中被告人胡某、丁某应构成何种犯罪,舆论媒体、法律界学者和诸多网民对此有两种观点：一种观点持“肯定说”,即赞成法院的判决,认为胡某、丁某的行为构成投放危险物质罪：另一种观点持“否定说”，即不赞成法院的判决,认为胡某、丁某的行为构成重大环境污染事故罪。第四部分是本案例双方争议焦点问题的法理分析。以犯罪构成四大要件为线索,依次分析了本文案件争议焦点涉及到的两个犯罪——重大环境事故罪和投放危险物质罪,并在此基础上,区分了两个犯罪在客体、主体、客观方面、主观方面方面存在的不同之处。最后对胡某、丁某行为进行定性分析,认为胡某、丁某的行为既不构成重大环境污染事故罪,也不构成投放危险物质罪。第五部分是本案的研究结论。首先,通过上文的分析得出结论：被告人应为无罪,但要加重对单位和个人的行政处罚。其次,深层次地研究当前刑法中规定的重大环境污染事故罪的缺陷和漏洞，例如主观方面、犯罪形态和法定刑等方面还存在不足。最后,针对本罪存在的重大缺陷，笔者提出修改和完善这一犯罪的立法建议。例如,建议将建议将污染环境罪所属的环境资源犯罪独立成章;主观方面修改为以过错责任为主,辅之以严格责任；修改本罪的犯罪形态：加大处罚力度,增加刑法种类等等。第六部分是结语。刑法是保护环境的最后一道防线,呼吁要通过完善刑法立法来防治污染、保护环境。
[Abstract]:This paper is a case study paper. The environment is related to the survival of mankind. In recent years, the environment pollution is serious, the environment pollution accident occurs frequently, but the environment criminal law lags behind the reality, can not effectively crack down on the crime of polluting the environment to protect the environment. Therefore, this paper analyzes and studies the case of water pollution in Yancheng, Jiangsu Province, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the environmental criminal law. This paper first introduces the cause of the crime and the basic situation of the case, then starts from the four elements of the constitution of the crime, analyzes the crime of major environmental pollution accident and the crime of putting in dangerous substances, and discusses the differences between the two respectively. On this basis, the author analyzes the legal nature of the defendant's behavior and draws a conclusion. Finally, this paper expounds the defects of the crime of major environmental pollution accident in the current legislation, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the crime. The whole paper is divided into six parts. The first part is the case of water pollution in Yancheng, Jiangsu province. The second part is the introduction of the case. This paper briefly introduces the basic situation of water pollution cases in Yancheng, Jiangsu Province. The third part is the controversial focus of the case. As to what kind of crime should be committed by the defendants Hu Mou and Ding Mou in this case, the media of public opinion, legal scholars and many netizens have two views on this: one view is "affirmative", that is, in favor of the court's decision, Hu Mou, Ding Mou's behavior constitutes the crime of placing dangerous substances: another view is "negation", that is, disapproval of the judgment of the court, that is, Hu Mou, Ding Mou's behavior constitutes the crime of serious environmental pollution accident. The fourth part is the legal analysis of the dispute between the two parties. Taking the four elements of crime as the clue, this paper analyzes in turn the two crimes involved in the dispute in this paper-the crime of major environmental accidents and the crime of putting in dangerous substances. On this basis, two crimes are distinguished between the object and the subject. Objective, subjective aspects of the existence of differences. Finally, the qualitative analysis of Hu and Ding's behavior shows that the behavior of Hu and Ding neither constitutes the crime of serious environmental pollution accident nor the crime of putting in dangerous substances. The fifth part is the conclusion of the case. First of all, through the above analysis, we draw the conclusion that the defendant should be innocent, but the administrative punishment of the unit and individual should be aggravated. Secondly, the defects and loopholes of the crime of major environmental pollution accidents stipulated in the current criminal law are deeply studied, such as subjective aspects, forms of crime and legal penalties, and so on. Finally, in view of the major defects of this crime, the author puts forward legislative suggestions to modify and perfect the crime. For example, it is suggested that the crime of environmental resources belonging to the crime of pollution of the environment be made into an independent chapter; the subjective aspect should be amended as the fault liability, supplemented by strict liability; the criminal form of the crime should be revised: the punishment should be increased, the type of criminal law should be increased, and so on. The sixth part is the conclusion. Criminal law is the last line of defense to protect the environment.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D922.6;D924

【参考文献】