论嫖宿幼女罪与奸淫幼女型强奸罪之关系

发布时间：2018-03-05 09:40

本文选题：嫖宿幼女罪　切入点：强奸罪　出处：《华侨大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着越来越多的幼女性侵案件的曝光，社会各界对于嫖宿幼女这一罪名的讨论愈发激烈。多数民众认为刑法对普通幼女和卖淫幼女制定了“双重标准”，嫖宿幼女罪是对卖淫幼女的歧视，其法定刑使得犯罪分子逃脱重刑的责罚。基于此，废除之声愈发高涨。嫖宿幼女罪自脱离强奸罪单独定罪之后，之所以会受到指责和谩骂，是因为未合理定位其与强奸罪，特别是奸淫幼女型强奸罪的关系所导致。本文试图通过对两罪的关系进行合理的定位，从而解决司法实践中两罪适用混乱，且易引起民众愤慨情绪的尴尬局面，以达到平等保护幼女的刑事政策要求和罪责刑相适应的刑法目的。本文首先对嫖宿幼女罪脱离强奸罪独立成罪的过程及其深层次的社会原因进行陈述，再依次论述当前学界主张的互斥论、法条竞合论、想象竞合论的具体观点和优势，并对其理论上、实践上的不足之处进行分析，最后根据“法典完美自足”的假设驳斥了主张废除和修改嫖宿幼女罪的观点，提出应当遵从现有法典体系的内部调节功能，并依照法条竞合理论特别法优先于普通法和有条件的重法优先于轻法的适用规则，重新阐释了嫖宿幼女罪和奸淫幼女型强奸罪的新型法条竞合关系。本文主张的法条竞合关系可阐释为：嫖宿幼女罪和奸淫幼女型强奸罪之间是法条竞合的关系，嫖宿幼女罪是奸淫幼女型强奸罪的特别法。在行为人与表意自愿的卖淫幼女发生性关系的情况下，一般根据特别法优先于普通法的原则，优先适用嫖宿幼女罪的规定；当发生236条第三款规定的五种加重情形（嫖宿幼女情节恶劣的、嫖宿幼女多人的、在公共场所当众嫖宿幼女的、二人以上共同轮流嫖宿幼女的以及嫖宿幼女致使被害人重伤、死亡或者造成其他严重后果的）时，由于适用特别法显失公平，，且刑法未明确指出必须适用特别法，同时亦未禁止普通法的适用，所以此时应当适用普通法，即奸淫幼女型强奸罪的规定。本文所主张的新法条竞合论，具有诸多优点：可以避免轻易倒向立法论的立场，驳斥了互斥论自身存在的悖论，避免滥用想象竞合导致的重刑主义。
[Abstract]:As more and more cases of sexual assault by young girls come to light, The discussion of the crime of whoring young girls is becoming more and more heated. Most people believe that the criminal law sets a "double standard" for ordinary young girls and young girls for prostitution, and that the crime of whoring young girls is discrimination against young girls in prostitution. Based on this, the voice of abrogation is rising. Since the crime of whoring young girls was convicted separately from the crime of rape, it has been accused and abused because it is not reasonably defined as the crime of rape. Especially the relationship between the crime of raping a young girl. This paper attempts to solve the confusion of the two crimes in judicial practice by reasonably positioning the relationship between the two crimes, and it is easy to cause the embarrassment of public indignation. In order to achieve equal protection of young girls' criminal policy requirements and criminal law. In this paper, the author first states the process and the deep social reasons of the crime of prostitute from the crime of rape, and then discusses the specific views and advantages of the theory of mutual exclusion, the theory of competing of laws and articles, the theory of imaginative concurrence, which are advocated by the current academic circles. At last, according to the hypothesis of "perfect self-sufficiency of the code", the author refutes the viewpoint that the crime of whoring young girls should be abolished and modified, and puts forward that the internal regulation function of the existing code system should be complied with. According to the applicable rules that the special law takes precedence over the common law and the conditional heavy law takes precedence over the light law, this paper reinterprets the new law concurrence relationship between the crime of whoring and the crime of adultery and rape. The relationship between the crime of whoring young girls and the crime of raping young girls of adultery is the relationship between the article and the article. The crime of whoring young girls is a special law for raping young girls. In the case of sexual relations between the perpetrator and the consensual prostitute, the provisions of the crime of whoring young girls are first applied according to the principle that the special law takes precedence over the common law. When there are five aggravating circumstances as specified in paragraph 3 of Article 236 (if the circumstances of a young girl are abominable, if there are more than one child in a public place, when the two or more of the two persons jointly take turns to whoring the young girl, and when the young girl causes serious injury to the victim, In the event of death or other serious consequences, since the application of the Lex specialis is manifestly unfair and the criminal law does not explicitly state that the Lex specialis must be applied, nor does it prohibit the application of the common law, the common law shall be applied at this time, That is, the crime of raping a young girl. The new law theory advocated in this paper has many advantages: it can avoid the position of easily turning to the legislative theory, and refutes the paradox of mutual exclusion. Avoid the abuse of imaginative concurrence resulting in heavy punishment.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.34

【参考文献】